Cited by 13Education, Achievement, and GiftednessCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skillsMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Math anxiety, self-centeredness, and dispositional mindfulness.

David, Amir, Rubinsten, Orly, Berkovich-Ohana, Aviva·2022·Journal of Educational Psychology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/edu0000550

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 13

Metadata

Authors
David, A., Rubinsten, O., & Berkovich-Ohana, A.
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
2022-02
Volume
114
Issue
2
Pages
393-407
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
OpenAlex
W3213157103
Cited by
13
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Bial Foundation (45069)
  • Foundational Questions Institute (FQXi-RFP-CPW-2004)
  • Fetzer Franklin Fund
  • Silicon Valley Community Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
mathematics anxiety, self-centeredness, trait mindfulness, mathematics learning, self-regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review