Cited by 71Stress Responses and CortisolMental Health Research TopicsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

When you see it coming: Stressor anticipation modulates stress effects on negative affect.

Open access
Neubauer, Andreas B., Smyth, Joshua M., Sliwinski, Martin J.·2018·Emotion

Abstract

Research on the effect of exposure to minor stressors in people's daily lives consistently reports negative effects on indicators of well-being, often coined stress reactivity. Recent advances in the intensity of data collection have brought about an increasing interest in within-day associations of stress exposure and indicators of well-being, including dynamic aspects of the stress response such as stress recovery. In the present work, we investigated the other end of the stress response: the anticipation of a stressor. We hypothesized that anticipation of an upcoming stressor would be accompanied by higher negative affect. Based on the anticipatory coping account, lower negative affect after occurrence of anticipated (vs. not anticipated) stressors was predicted. We approached this question with a measurement burst study that allowed us to disentangle variation in stress processes across different time scales. One-hundred and seventy-five participants (mean age = 50, range 20-79) completed up to 3 measurement bursts. Each burst consisted of an ecological momentary assessment with 5 assessments per day over 7 days. In line with our expectations, negative affect was significantly higher after stressor anticipation, especially on days with high levels of intrusive thoughts. However, negative affect was not lower after anticipated (vs. not anticipated) stressors. Findings point to the role of perseverative cognition in the effect of stressor anticipation. Directions for future…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/emo0000381

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Anticipation of stressors leads to more negative affect and greater cortisol reactivity both on the morning of anticipation and during the stressor.

    “EMA studies have shown that anticipation of stressors leads to more negative affect (Neubauer et al., 2017) as well as greater cortisol reactivity both on the morning of anticipation and during the stressor (Wetherell et al., 2015).”

    From More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science (2018) · cites this paper as Neubauer et al., 2017

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 56 · Cited by 71

Authors
Neubauer, A. B., Smyth, J. M., & Sliwinski, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Emotion
Published
2018-04
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
342-354
ISSN
  • 1528-3542 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-1516
OpenAlex
W2770991339
Cited by
71
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Emotion (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01-AG026728)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
negative affect, stress reactivity, anticipatory coping, intrusive thoughts, perseverative cognition, stress recovery, ecological momentary assessment, well-being
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Stress, Psychological, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review