Cited by 34Behavioral Health and InterventionsHuman Behavior and MotivationMotivation and Self-Concept in Sports

Know Your Preferences: Self-Regulation as Need-Congruent Goal Selection

Open access
Grund, Axel, Fries, Stefan, Rheinberg, Falko·2018·Review of General Psychology

Abstract

Theory and research on self-regulation is dominated by a social–cognitive perspective that places an emphasis on postdecisional (i.e., volitional) control processes of goal-maintenance in response to dual-motive conflict. In the current contribution, we focus on research on self-regulation that acknowledges the affective fundamentals of motivated action, and we highlight processes of goal selection as vital parts of self-regulation. From our perspective of motivational competence, affective and cognitive processes work together rather than oppose each other in self-regulation, rendering effortless rather than effortful goal pursuit as the hallmark of efficient human action. A precondition for such motive- and self-congruent goal pursuits is that individuals have insight into their basic preferences and (can) act accordingly. Therefore, we address capacities, such as mindfulness, which may take effect in predecisional (i.e., motivational) action phases, thereby determining all subsequent action processes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/gpr0000159

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies have integrated mindfulness into self-determination theory to show that having mindful tendencies is more likely to lead to satisfying needs for competence, autonomy, and relatedness because mindfulness allows individuals to perceive and monitor their inner and outer states in comprehensive and receptive ways.

    “Studies have integrated mindfulness into SDT to show that having mindful tendencies is more likely to lead to satisfying needs for competence, autonomy, and relatedness [79] because mindfulness allows individuals to perceive and monitor their inner and outer states in comprehensive and receptive ways [19, 50, 55, 80].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 122 · Cited by 34

Authors
Grund, A., Fries, S., & Rheinberg, F.
Affiliations
  • Bielefeld University (DE)
  • University of Potsdam (DE)
Corresponding author
Grund, Axel
Venue
Review of General Psychology
Published
2018-12
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
437-451
ISSN
  • 1089-2680 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1552
OpenAlex
W2893139632
Cited by
34
References
122
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
3.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Review of General Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • publish.UP (University of Potsdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Behavior and Motivation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Keywords
self-regulation, goal selection, motivational competence, emotional processing, mindfulness, goal pursuit

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review