The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phyletic differences in learning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Psychology: A Study of A Science
ED, K. S., & Albert, E. (1962) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-196210000-00015 · Cited by 1,917
Experimental methods and instrumentation in psychology
Sidowski, J. B. (1966) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 786
Beach, F. A. (1950) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0056510 · Cited by 458
Toward a comparative psychology of learning.
Bitterman, M. E. (1960) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0048359 · Cited by 212
Self-citationBitterman, M. E., Wodinsky, J., & Candland, D. K. (1958) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1419199 · Cited by 139
Self-citationProbability-Matching in the Fish
Behrend, E. R., & Bitterman, M. E. (1961) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1419664 · Cited by 104
Self-citationFURTHER EXPERIMENTS ON PROBABILITY‐MATCHING IN THE PIGEON1
Graf, V., Bullock, D. H., & Bitterman, M. E. (1964) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1901/jeab.1964.7-151 · Cited by 65
Self-citationProbability-Learning and Habit-Reversal in the Cockroach
Longo, N. (1964) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1419269 · Cited by 60
Probability-Matching in the Pigeon
Bullock, D. H., & Bitterman, M. E. (1962) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1420288 · Cited by 57
Self-citationBullock, D. H., & Bitterman, M. E. (1962) · Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0041070 · Cited by 42
Self-citation
Cited by
Herrnstein, R. J. (1970) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243 · Cited by 2,611
Gallistel, C. R., & Gibbon, J. (2000) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.107.2.289 · Cited by 1,115
The evolution of self-control.
MacLean, E. L., Hare, B., Nunn, C. L., Addessi, E., Amici, F., Anderson, R. C., Aureli, F., Baker, J. M., Bania, A. E., Barnard, A. M., et al. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1323533111 · Cited by 819
Scala naturae: Why there is no theory in comparative psychology.
Hodos, W., & Campbell, C. B. G. (1969) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0027523 · Cited by 583
Deaner, R. O., Isler, K., Burkart, J., & van Schaik, C. (2007) · Brain, Behavior and Evolution · doi:10.1159/000102973 · Cited by 549
Metadata
- Authors
- Bitterman, M. E.
- Venue
- American Psychologist
- Published
- 1965-06
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 396-410
- ISSN
- 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-990X
- OpenAlex
- W1998362883
- Cited by
- 494
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 30.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phyletic differences in learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/h0022328
- The paper
- Bitterman, M. E. (1965). Phyletic differences in learning. American Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022328
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
