Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 630

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Psychological and physiological differences between good and poor sleepers.

Monroe, Lawrence J.·1967·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

PHYSIOLOGICAL, PERSONALITY, AND EEG SLEEP PATTERNS OF 16 POOR-SLEEP GROUP (PSG) SS WERE COMPARED WITH 16 GOOD-SLEEP GROUP (GSG) SS. COMPARED WITH GOOD SLEEPERS, POOR SLEEPERS HAD LESS SLEEP TIME, A HIGHER PROPORTION OF STAGE 2 SLEEP, MARKEDLY LESS REM SLEEP DESPITE A SIMILAR NUMBER OF REM PERIODS, MORE AWAKENINGS, AND REQUIRED MORE TIME TO FALL ASLEEP. SIGNIFICANT PHYSIOLOGICAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE GROUPS WERE OBSERVED DURING ALL STAGES OF SLEEP AND DURING A PRESLEEP PERIOD. PERSONALITY TEST RESULTS CLEARLY INDICATED A MUCH HIGHER PROBABILITY OF SYMPTOMATIC COMPLAINTS AMONG POOR SLEEPERS AS WELL AS A STRONG POTITIVE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DREAMING AND INDEXES OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY. THIS STUDY DID NOT RESOLVE CAUSE AND EFFECT RELATIONSHIPS AMONG PHYSIOLOGICAL VARIABLES, PERSONALITY MEASURES, AMOUNT OF DREAMING, AND GOOD AND POOR SLEEP; HOWEVER, SIGNIFICANT EEG, PHYSIOLOGICAL, AND PSYCHOLOGICAL DIFFERENCES WERE DEMONSTRATED. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0024563

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

See all 630

Metadata

Authors
Monroe, L. J.
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
1967-06
Volume
72
Issue
3
Pages
255-264
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W1976848115
Cited by
630
References
10
FWCI
22.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Psychological and physiological differences between good and poor sleepers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/h0024563
The paper
Monroe, L. J. (1967). Psychological and physiological differences between good and poor sleepers. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024563

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.