Current methodology in research on the etiology of schizophrenia: Serious difficulties which suggest the use of the high-risk-group method.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Altered reward-network responsivity may be characteristic of individuals with a history of MDD but without significant current symptoms, suggesting that anhedonia may represent a trait marker of MDD vulnerability independent of current MDD state.
“Altered reward-network responsivity may also be characteristic of individuals with a history of MDD but without significant current symptoms, suggesting that anhedonia may represent a trait marker of MDD vulnerability, independent of current MDD state [233,234].”
From Reward circuitry dysfunction in psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders and genetic syndromes: animal models and clinical findings (2012) · cites this paper as [234]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 204
- Authors
- Mednick, S. A., & McNeil, T. F.
- Affiliations
- Copenhagen Municipal Hospital (DK)
- ORCID
- McNeil, Thomas F.
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1968-12
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 6, Pt.1
- Pages
- 681-693
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2009556942
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 7.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Keywords
- schizophrenia, etiology of schizophrenia, high-risk groups, family history (medicine), genetic factors, methodological issues
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Methods, Models, Psychological, Research, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
