The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Laterality differences in perception: A review.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The information available in brief visual presentations
Sperling, G. (1960) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0093759 · Cited by 4,042
Cited by
PERCEPTION OF BILATERAL CHIMERIC FIGURES FOLLOWING HEMISPHERIC DECONNEXION
LEVY, J., TREVARTHEN, C., & SPERRY, R. W. (1972) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/95.1.61 · Cited by 579
Hemisphere differences in the acquisition and use of descriptive systems
Goldberg, E., & Costa, L. D. (1981) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/0093-934x(81)90072-9 · Cited by 507
Visual interference in the parafoveal recognition of initial and final letters of words
Bouma, H. (1973) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(73)90041-2 · Cited by 481
Right Hemisphere Lateralization for Emotion in the Human Brain: Interactions with Cognition
Schwartz, G. E., Davidson, R. J., & Maer, F. (1975) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1179210 · Cited by 447
Eye and Head Turning Indicates Cerebral Lateralization
Kinsbourne, M. (1972) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.176.4034.539 · Cited by 435
Metadata
- Authors
- White, M. J.
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1969-12
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 387-405
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2004689460
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Laterality differences in perception: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/h0028343
- The paper
- White, M. J. (1969). Laterality differences in perception: A review. Psychological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028343
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
