Fate of arbitrary traditions in a laboratory microculture
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An organization can preserve knowledge of the past even when key staff leave the organization because processes of sharing organizational interpretation systems outperform the individual level.
“The processes of sharing organizational interpretation systems outperform the individual level.This is one of the reasons why an organization preserving the knowledge of the past even when key staff leave the Organization (Weick & Gilfillan, 1971).”
From Linking knowledge management, organizational learning and memory (2020) · cites this paper as Weick & Gilfillan, 1971
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 5 · Cited by 77
- Authors
- Weick, K. E., & Gilfillan, D. P.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1971-02
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 179-191
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2023622213
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 1.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
- Keywords
- social norms, norm formation, social influence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
