Scientific communication: Its role in the conduct of research and creation of knowledge.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A key principle of science communication is accurately describing how data was collected and analyzed.
“A key principle of science communication is accurately describing how data was collected and analyzed [32].”
From Grounded theory in software engineering research: a critical review and guidelines (2016) · cites this paper as [32]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 7 · Cited by 225
- Authors
- Garvey, W. D., & Griffith, B. C.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Venue
- American Psychologist
- Published
- 1971-04
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 349-362
- ISSN
- 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-990X
- OpenAlex
- W2082514985
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 28.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Keywords
- science communication, research conduct, knowledge production, scholarly publishing, research dissemination
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
