Effects of prior uncertainty on incidental free recall.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Berlyne and Normore (1972) found that inducing and then satisfying curiosity by presenting a blurred picture before a clear picture of the same object led to better memory for the objects than presenting the clear picture for twice as long.
“Berlyne and Normore (1972) found that inducing, then satisfying, curiosity by presenting a blurred picture immediately before a clear picture of the same object, led to better memory for the objects than presenting the clear picture for twice as long.”
From The benefit of generating errors during learning (2014) · cites this paper as Berlyne and Normore (1972)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The benefit of generating errors during learning
Potts, R., & Shanks, D. R. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0033194 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
- Authors
- Berlyne, D. E., & Normore, L. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology
- Published
- 1972-11
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 43-48
- ISSN
- 0022-1015 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2024674604
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- prior uncertainty, memory retrieval, prior knowledge
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
