The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sex, personality, and physiological variables in the communication of affect via facial expression.
Abstract
Senders viewed 25 emotionally loaded color slides. Their facial expressions were observed via a hidden television camera by observers who made judgments about the nature of each slide and the sender's reaction to it. A total of 64 undergraduates were arranged in eight pairings each of females sending to male observers, females sending to females, males sending to males, and males sending to females. Statistically significant communication was demonstrated, with females being more accurate senders than males. More accurate senders tended to show a smaller skin conductance and heart rale response to the slides and a more personal verbal report of their emotional reaction to the slides. Several personality measures were related to communication accuracy and physiological responding. The role of nonverbal behavior in the process of communication has been the subject of much recent study in both animals and humans. An important beginning has been made toward analyzing the specific facial, postural, and gestural cues that inform others about the affective state of an individual (e.g., Ekman, 1972; Izard, 1971). Other experiments have been directed to the study of differences in the ability to send and receive accurate nonverbal messages and the implications of such ability in one's social and emotional life.3 Miller and his colleagues have developed a paradigm for studying individual differences in the nonverbal sending and receiving ability of rhesus monkeys (Miller, 1967; Miller, Caul, & Mirsky, 1967). This paradigm has been adapted to the study of humans by Gubar (1966) and Lanzetta and Kleck
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Communication of affect through facial expressions in humans.
Buck, R. W., Savin, V. J., Miller, R. E., & Caul, W. F. (1972) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0033171 · Cited by 259
Self-citation
Cited by
Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990) · Imagination, Cognition and Personality · doi:10.2190/dugg-p24e-52wk-6cdg · Cited by 10,484
Russell, J. A. (1994) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.102 · Cited by 1,640
The Tie That Binds? Coherence Among Emotion Experience, Behavior, and Physiology.
Mauss, I. B., Levenson, R. W., McCarter, L., Wilhelm, F. H., & Gross, J. J. (2005) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/1528-3542.5.2.175 · Cited by 1,201
Charisma, positive emotions and mood contagion
Bono, J. E., & Ilies, R. (2006) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.04.008 · Cited by 905
Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues.
Hall, J. A. (1978) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.85.4.845 · Cited by 766
Metadata
- Authors
- Buck, R., Miller, R. E., & Caul, W. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1974
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 587-596
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2139727799
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sex, personality, and physiological variables in the communication of affect via facial expression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/h0037041
- The paper
- Buck, R., Miller, R. E., & Caul, W. F. (1974). Sex, personality, and physiological variables in the communication of affect via facial expression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037041
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.