The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relationship of role conflict and role ambiguity to job involvement measures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“higher-level jobs tend to have more autonomy, decision latitude, and other coping resources (e.g., power, prestige, income) that enable individuals who occupy these jobs to better handle and cope with threatening work-related demands.”
From A Meta-Analysis of Work Demand Stressors and Job Performance: Examining Main and Moderating Effects (2008) · cites this paper as Hamner & Tosi, 1974
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Role conflict and ambiguity as critical variables in a model of organizational behavior
House, R. J., & Rizzo, J. R. (1972) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(72)90030-x · Cited by 1,068
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Meta-Analysis of Work Demand Stressors and Job Performance: Examining Main and Moderating Effects
GILBOA, S., SHIROM, A., FRIED, Y., & COOPER, C. (2008) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00113.x · Cited by 1,072
Man Tang, P., Koopman, J., McClean, S. T., Zhang, J. H., Li, C. H., De Cremer, D., Lu, Y., & Ng, C. T. S. (2022) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2020.1516 · Cited by 370
Metadata
- Authors
- Hamner, W. C., & Tosi, H. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Psychology
- Published
- 1974-08
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 497-499
- ISSN
- 1939-1854
- 0021-9010
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
