Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Preparatory set variables related to classical conditioning of autonomic responses

Grings, William W.·1960·Psychological Review

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0046852

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Cited by

See all 112

Metadata

Authors
Grings, W. W.
Corresponding author
Grings, William W.
Venue
Psychological Review
Published
1960-07
Volume
67
Issue
4
Pages
243-252
ISSN
  • 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1471
OpenAlex
W2003201378
Cited by
112
References
12
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
5.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
classical conditioning, autonomic responses, preparatory set, set variables, autonomic conditioning
MeSH terms
Autonomic Nervous System, Conditioning, Classical, Humans, Reflex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preparatory set variables related to classical conditioning of autonomic responses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/h0046852
The paper
Grings, W. W. (1960). Preparatory set variables related to classical conditioning of autonomic responses. Psychological Review. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046852

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.