The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of "brainstorming" instructions on creative problem solving by trained and untrained subjects.
Abstract
Two initial papers have reported the results of an investigation of the effects of the brainstonning method on creative thinking (Meadow & Parnes, 1959; Meadow, Parnes, & Reese, in press). In this method, a subject is instructed to attempt to solve problems by recording all tentative solutions which occur to him, postponing judicial evaluation of those solutions to a subsequent time period (Osborn, 1957). The results of the first experiment indicated that a class group instructed for one semester in creative problem solving methods (which emphasized brainstorming) increased its productivity in five of seven tests of creative ability as compared with a control group (Meadow & Parnes, 1959). The second study investigated the effects (in two creative ability problems) of the brainstonning method as compared with a good ideas, penalty for bad instruction, utilizing the same subjects for each instruction. Results again indicated a superior performance for the brainstorming instructions (Meadow et al., in press). Both of these experiments employed subjects who were taking the course in creative problem solving which emphasized brainstorming methods (Parnes, 1958). The present study was designed to determine whether the brainstonning instructions would be effective with untrained students who had never received previous instruction in the method. Three hypotheses were formulated: (a) With a group of untrained subjects, the brainstorming as compared with nonbrainstorming instructions will produce a significant increment in absolute number of good quality ideas 1 This research was financed by a grant from the Creative Education Foundation. on two creative ability problems. (6) The interaction effects found in a previous experiment (Meadow et al., in press) will be confirmed. Specifically, a nonbrainstorming instruction administered first will inhibit the absolute number of good quality ideas produced under a brainstorming instruction which follows. Similarly, a difficult problem administered first will inhibit the absolute number of good quality ideas produced in a relatively easy problem presented in a test period which follows, (c) If the brainstorming instructions are administered to a group of students who have taken a one-semester course in creative problem solving emphasizing this technique, and to a group of students who have not taken the course, the former group will produce a significantly greater absolute number of good quality ideas than the latter group. METHOD
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
ASSESSING THE WORK ENVIRONMENT FOR CREATIVITY.
AMABILE, T. M., CONTI, R., COON, H., LAZENBY, J., & HERRON, M. (1996) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256995 · Cited by 6,029
Problem solving and behavior modification.
D'Zurilla, T. J., & Goldfried, M. R. (1971) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0031360 · Cited by 2,257
Runco, M. A. (2004) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141502 · Cited by 994
Paulus, P. B., & Brown, V. R. (2007) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00006.x · Cited by 364
Group Dynamics in Janis's Theory of Groupthink: Backward and Forward
McCauley, C. (1998) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2759 · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Parnes, S. J., & Meadow, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Educational Psychology
- Published
- 1959-08
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 171-176
- ISSN
- 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2176
- OpenAlex
- W2125140607
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of "brainstorming" instructions on creative problem solving by trained and untrained subjects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/h0047223
- The paper
- Parnes, S. J., & Meadow, A. (1959). Effects of "brainstorming" instructions on creative problem solving by trained and untrained subjects. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047223
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.