Cited by 24Personality Traits and PsychologyPsychological Testing and AssessmentSocial and Intergroup Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Introversion-extroversion.

Guilford, J. P.·1934·Psychological Bulletin

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0072741

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Guilford (1934) suggested that inconsistent findings on the extraversion-intelligence relationship were due to the use of different measures of the construct and the assessment of different samples.

    “Guilford (1934) suggested that the inconsistent findings were due to the use of different measures of the construct and the assessment of different samples.”

    From Extraversion and intelligence: A meta-analytic investigation (2005) · cites this paper as Guilford, 1934

  • Other early studies found a slight superiority in introverts on intelligence.

    “Several researchers found nonsignificant relationships (e.g., Finch & Nemzek, 1932; Gilliland & Voas, 1930; Guthrie, 1927; Hanna, 1932; Hoitsma, 1925; McGeoch & Whitely, 1933; Powers, 1931), and others a slight superiority in introverts (e.g., Guilford, 1934; Hendrickson & Huskey, 1932; Oliver, 1930; Pechstein, 1928; Stanger, 1932, 1933); correlation coefficients never exceeded a 0.2 magnitude.”

    From Extraversion and intelligence: A meta-analytic investigation (2005) · cites this paper as Guilford, 1934

  • Gilliland (1934) and Guilford (1934) suggested that mixed empirical findings on the extraversion-intelligence correlation might be due to the use of different measures of extraversion.

    “Thus, Gilliand (1934), in addition to Guilford (1934), suggested that the mixed empirical findings with respect to the correlation between extraversion and intelligence might be due to the use of the different measures of extraversion.”

    From Extraversion and intelligence: A meta-analytic investigation (2005) · cites this paper as Guilford (1934)

  • Gilliland (1934) and Guilford (1934) suggested that the extraversion-intelligence relationship may differ based on different measures of extraversion.

    “Gilliland (1934) and Guilford (1934) suggested that the extraversion-intelligence relationship may differ based on different measures of extraversion.”

    From Extraversion and intelligence: A meta-analytic investigation (2005) · cites this paper as Guilford, 1934

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Guilford, J. P.
Corresponding author
Guilford, J. P.
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
1934-05
Volume
31
Issue
5
Pages
331-354
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W4254918832
Cited by
24
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
9.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
introversion, extraversion, personality traits, temperament

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review