The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The measurement of efficiency in reading.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Word recognition includes two processes: the ability to decode written words and the ability to decode words instantly and automatically, in addition to psychological and ecological components.
“Word recognition includes two processes: (a) the ability to decode written words and (b) the ability to decode words instantly and automatically, in addition to psychological and ecological components [99].”
From Curriculum-Based Measurement: A Brief History of Nearly Everything from the 1970s to the Present (2013) · cites this paper as [99]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Curriculum-Based Measurement: A Brief History of Nearly Everything from the 1970s to the Present
Tindal, G. (2013) · ISRN Education · doi:10.1155/2013/958530 · Cited by 59
“Speed in word reading again is a factor in assessment of reading and has long been of interest to researchers [100] and over the years consistently documented its relation with comprehension [101].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Starch, D.
- Corresponding author
- Starch, Daniel
- Venue
- Journal of Educational Psychology
- Published
- 1915-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-24
- ISSN
- 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2176
- OpenAlex
- W2059347941
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 13.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Social Sciences › Education › Literacy and Educational Practices
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Keywords
- reading efficiency, reading speed, reading comprehension, reading assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
