Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Development and evaluation of an interpersonal skill-training program for psychiatric inpatients.

Goldsmith, Jean B., McFall, Richard M.·1975·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

1 behavioral-analytic method for assessing competence, we spent nearly two years systematically using this method to develop an interpersonal skills-training program for the treat- ment of male psychiatric inpatients, along with an associated measurement model. As we were com- pleting this developmental work, Goldfried informed us that he had found the method unworkable due to its inherent tendency toward producing a data overload. For purely practical reasons, however, we had modified the method, restricting our focus

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0076264

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 264

Metadata

Authors
Goldsmith, J. B., & McFall, R. M.
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
1975-02
Volume
84
Issue
1
Pages
51-58
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W2053174385
Cited by
264
References
0
FWCI
32.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development and evaluation of an interpersonal skill-training program for psychiatric inpatients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/h0076264
The paper
Goldsmith, J. B., & McFall, R. M. (1975). Development and evaluation of an interpersonal skill-training program for psychiatric inpatients. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076264

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.