The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interrater reliability and agreement of subjective judgments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales
Cohen, J. (1960) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316446002000104 · Cited by 42,398
Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit
Cohen, J. (1968) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0026256 · Cited by 8,736
Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters.
Fleiss, J. L. (1971) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0031619 · Cited by 8,733
Fleiss, J. L., & Cohen, J. (1973) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316447303300309 · Cited by 3,354
The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as a Measure of Reliability
Bartko, J. J. (1966) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1966.19.1.3 · Cited by 2,299
Measures of Association for Cross Classifications
Goodman, L. A., & Kruskal, W. H. (1979) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-9995-0 · Cited by 2,244
Boneau, C. A., & Hays, W. L. (1966) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1420739 · Cited by 1,881
Reliability of Content Analysis: The Case of Nominal Scale Coding
Scott, W. A. (1955) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/266577 · Cited by 1,853
Large sample standard errors of kappa and weighted kappa.
Fleiss, J. L., Cohen, J., & Everitt, B. S. (1969) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0028106 · Cited by 1,520
Estimation of the reliability of ratings.
Ebel, R. L. (1951) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02288803 · Cited by 976
Cited by
Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations
Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007) · Research in Nursing & Health · doi:10.1002/nur.20199 · Cited by 5,273
Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability
Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Bracken, C. C. (2002) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x · Cited by 3,068
rwg: an assessment of within-group interrater agreement
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1993) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.306 · Cited by 2,221
Social perception and interpersonal behavior: On the self-fulfilling nature of social stereotypes.
Snyder, M., Tanke, E. D., & Berscheid, E. (1977) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.35.9.656 · Cited by 1,310
Interrater agreement and interrater reliability: Key concepts, approaches, and applications
Gisev, N., Bell, J. S., & Chen, T. F. (2013) · Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy · doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2012.04.004 · Cited by 924
Metadata
- Authors
- Tinsley, H. E., & Weiss, D. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Counseling Psychology
- Published
- 1975-07
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 358-376
- ISSN
- 0022-0167 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2090280719
- Cited by
- 852
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 24.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interrater reliability and agreement of subjective judgments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/h0076640
- The paper
- Tinsley, H. E., & Weiss, D. J. (1975). Interrater reliability and agreement of subjective judgments. Journal of Counseling Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076640
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
