Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 200

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effect of irrational beliefs on emotional arousal.

Goldfried, Marvin R., Sobocinski, Donald·1975·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

This article studied the relationship between the tendency to hold certain irrational beliefs and the likelihood of becoming emotionally aroused in various types of situations. The first experiment was correlational and found a positive relationship between irrational beliefs and paper-and-pencil measures of interpersonal, examination, and public speaking anxiety. The second experiment focused on one specific irrational belief—the overriding importance of social approval—and investigated the likelihood of emotional arousal occurring among individuals who ascribed to this belief. When asked to imagine themselves in social situations that might be interpreted as involving rejection by others, subjects holding this belief reported feeling significantly more anxious and angry than those who did not. Both the theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed. Psychodynamic theorists have long recognized the importance of cognitive and symbolic activities as a determinant of emotional arousal. Although the general psychodynamic paradigm has come under heavy criticism by social learning theorists, such criticism is due less to the emphasis on cognitive factors than to the highly inferential and nonverifiable constructs employed in such attempts to understand human behavior. In fact, numerous social learning theorists (Bandura, 1969; Dollard & Miller, 19SO; Mowrer, 1960; Rotter, 1954; Staats & Staats, 1963) have placed great emphasis on the importance of cognitive processes as a significant determinant of emotional arousal. The acknowledgment by social learning theorists that cognition may mediate emotion does not necessarily negate the possibility that emotional arousal may occur without the existence of any mediating processes. Thus, Bandura (1969) has suggested that emotional behavior in humans may be divided into two types: The overall evidence would seem to indicate that emotional behavior may be controlled by two different stimulus sources. One is the emotional arousal self-generated by symbolic activities in the form of

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0076787

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 200

Metadata

Authors
Goldfried, M. R., & Sobocinski, D.
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
1975
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
504-510
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2100370181
Cited by
200
References
0
FWCI
15.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of irrational beliefs on emotional arousal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/h0076787
The paper
Goldfried, M. R., & Sobocinski, D. (1975). Effect of irrational beliefs on emotional arousal. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076787

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.