The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Factors affecting entrapment in waiting situations: The Rosencrantz and Guildenstern effect.
Abstract
Seventy-two undergraduates took part an experimental study of entrapment, which the passage of time could be viewed either as an investment (increasing the likelihood of goal attainment) or as an expense. Subjects were . given an opportunity to win a large sum of money (the jackpot), which decreased value over time. In order to win the jackpot, a series of crossword puzzle words had to be solved, some of which were so difficult that the use of a necessary, scarce resource (a crossword dictionary) was required. And order to obtain the use of this resource, subjects had to wait in until it became available—which it never did. Three variables were varied a 2X2X2 design: rate of decrement of the jackpot, availability of a chart providing continuous information about this decrement, and information concerning subjects' (presumed) position line for the dictionary. Entrapment this waiting conflict was found to be high overall, and was further heightened when (a) the size of the jackpot decreased slowly rather than rapidly, (b) when no payoff chart was made available, and (c) when subjects were told they were first rather than third line for the dictionary. We've traveled too far, and our momentum has taken over; we move idly towards eternity, without possibility of reprieve or hope of explanation. —Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz & Guildenstern Are Dead Social psychologists such as Deutsch (1973), Schilling (1960), and others have long been interested the circumstances underlying entrapment a variety of conflict situations. One type of conflict which entrapment commonly occurs, for example, is an auction, which bidding typically escalates at increasing cost to the participants. In the presence of others with whom they are competing for some desirable object or resource, bidders tend to increase the magnitude of their offers, often above and beyond the objective value of the object question. Indeed, Shubik (1971) has described an auction game which entrapment is so intense that a dollar bill may be auctioned off for considerably more than the one dollar at stake! Gambling, similarly, can be interpreted as a conflict situation which entrapment is likely to occur—particu larly when the gambler wishes to recoup losses he has already incurred and therefore decides to roll the dice just one more time,
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Self-regulation failure: an overview.
Baumeister, R. F., & Heatherton, T. F. (1996) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0701_1 · Cited by 2,266
Top executive commitment to the status quo: Some tests of its determinants
Hambrick, D. C., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Fredrickson, J. W. (1993) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250140602 · Cited by 1,058
The Convergence of Gambling and Digital Media: Implications for Gambling in Young People
King, D., Delfabbro, P., & Griffiths, M. (2010) · Journal of Gambling Studies · doi:10.1007/s10899-009-9153-9 · Cited by 283
Understanding Behavior in Escalation Situations
Staw, B. M., & Ross, J. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.246.4927.216 · Cited by 274
Baumeister, R. F. (1997) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.1.2.145 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Rubin, J. Z., & Brockner, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1975-06
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1054-1063
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2112397712
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors affecting entrapment in waiting situations: The Rosencrantz and Guildenstern effect. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/h0076937
- The paper
- Rubin, J. Z., & Brockner, J. (1975). Factors affecting entrapment in waiting situations: The Rosencrantz and Guildenstern effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076937
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.