Heart rate and cardiac phase influences on visual perception.
Abstract
Twenty-six subjects were tested with a tachistoscopic recognition task while heart rate and several other autonomic indexes were monitored. In Experiment 1, heart rate was employed as an independent variable, and stimulus presentation was contingent upon the presence of individually determined low, middle, and high heart rates. The results indicated that low heart rate facilitated performance especially for stimuli presented at the fastest exposure. In Experiment 2, stimulus presentation was dependent upon cardiac phase. The findings indicated that stimulus recognition was enhanced during the cardiac P wave, but the effect was apparent only during the fastest exposure. Multiple regression analyses of the individual subject's data during both experiments indicated that highly idiosyncratic patterns of physiological responses predicted perceptual performance. The results were interpreted as being consistent with the formulations of the Laceys and also suggested that cerebral perfusion be considered as a relevant determinant of behavior.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In vision, mostly null results are reported for emotionally neutral stimuli.
“and in vision, mostly null results are reported for emotionally neutral stimuli 33,66,67 .”
From Interoceptive rhythms in the brain (2023) · cites this paper as [67]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Interoceptive rhythms in the brain
Engelen, T., Solcà, M., & Tallon-Baudry, C. (2023) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-023-01425-1 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
The Insula Mediates Access to Awareness of Visual Stimuli Presented Synchronously to the Heartbeat
Salomon, R., Ronchi, R., Dönz, J., Bello-Ruiz, J., Herbelin, B., Martet, R., Faivre, N., Schaller, K., & Blanke, O. (2016) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4262-15.2016 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Heartbeat and somatosensory perception
Al, E., Iliopoulos, F., Nikulin, V. V., & Villringer, A. (2021) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118247 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Active information sampling varies across the cardiac cycle
Kunzendorf, S., Klotzsche, F., Akbal, M., Villringer, A., Ohl, S., & Gaebler, M. (2019) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.13322 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sandman, C. A., McCanne, T. R., Kaiser, D. N., & Diamond, B.
- ORCID
- Sandman, Curt A.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology
- Published
- 1977
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 189-202
- ISSN
- 0021-9940 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1986038664
- Cited by
- 100
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 1.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- heart rate, cardiac phase, visual perception, stimulus recognition, autonomic nervous system, P wave, exposure duration, cerebral perfusion
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Behavior, Brain, Female, Fingers, Galvanic Skin Response, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Ophthalmic Artery, Plethysmography, Pulse, Respiration, Visual Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review