Modulation of behavioral inhibition in appetitive extinction following manipulation of adrenal steroids in rats: Implications for involvement of the hippocampus.
Abstract
Corticosterone, the principal glucocorticoid in the rat, binds selectively to the CA1 pyramidal neurons of the hippocampus where the hormone has been demonstrated to exert a moderate chronic suppression of spontaneous activity. In the first experiment of the current study, the functional behavioral significance of this hormone--brain interaction was investigated in the extinction of an appetitive runway response in normal rats and those with lesions of the hippocampus. During extinction, half of the animals in each group were given daily subcutaneous injections of corticosterone. Whie the classical retardation effect of hippocampal lesions on appetitive extinction was replicated, hormone treatment was without effect in normal or hippocampally damaged subjects. The absence of a hormone effect in normals was primarily attributed to a saturated limited-binding system operating in the normal animal. Experiment 2 tested this notion, repeating the first experiment, with adrenal-ectomized (ADX), ADX + corticosterone replacement, and normal groups of animals. Adrenalectomy produced a striking facilitation of extinction which was speculated to be the result of a hyperactive inhibitory neural organ free from an inhibitory endocrine feedback. Corticosterone treatment normalized the progress of extinction in ADX animals, providing support for the afore-mentioned speculation. In the normal animal, it appears that a stress-induced surge in hormone level interacts with a limited-capacity neural binding to produce a transient dynamic range of behavioral disinhibition, perhaps promoting persistence during initial stages of frustrative nonreward in moderate stress tasks.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hippocampal function may be suppressed during periods of prolonged stress.
“Subsequent glucocorticoid-related behavioral work from his group led to the conclusion that “hippocampal function may indeed be suppressed during periods of prolonged stress” (Micco et al. [124, page 328]).”
From The Temporal Dynamics Model of Emotional Memory Processing: A Synthesis on the Neurobiological Basis of Stress-Induced Amnesia, Flashbulb and Traumatic Memories, and the Yerkes-Dodson Law (2007) · cites this paper as Micco et al. [124]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 80
- Authors
- Micco, D. J., McEwen, B. S., & Shein, W.
- Affiliations
- Rockefeller University (US)
- ORCID
- McEwen, Bruce S.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology
- Published
- 1979
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 323-329
- ISSN
- 0021-9940 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2034879076
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- corticosterone, glucocorticoids, hippocampus, CA1 pyramidal neurons, hippocampal lesions, adrenalectomy, corticosterone replacement, behavioral inhibition, behavioral disinhibition, stress, frustrative nonreward
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Appetitive Behavior, Brain Mapping, Corticosterone, Extinction, Psychological, Hippocampus, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review