Cited by 50

Measuring deaf cultural identities: A preliminary investigation.

Glickman, Neil S., Carey, John C.·1993·Rehabilitation Psychology

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop an instrument, the Deaf Identity Development Scale (DIDS), to measure how deaf people identify with the Deaf community and Deaf culture. An identity development model with four different cultural orientations with regard to the Deaf community was the basis of the instrument. A 60-item instrument, the DIDS was developed and translated from English to American Sign Language (ASL) on videotape. The ASL version was back-translated into English and the two English language versions were checked for equivalency. The DIDS was administered to two samples of deaf subjects who were expected to exhibit different types of Deaf identity. One- hundred-and-five deaf students from Gallaudet University and 56 members of the Association of Late Deafened Adults-Boston completed the DIDS. Results showed strong internal consistency with the scales. Initial use of the DIDS for comparing these two samples of Deaf subjects suggests the DIDS can be used to distinguish different Deaf cultural orientations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0080304

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Glickman and Carey proposed four developmental stages for deaf identities based on people's relation with Deaf culture: culturally hearing, culturally marginal, immersion, and bicultural.

    “Researchers in psychology that sought to illustrate diversity came up with a model consisting of four developmental stages for deaf identities on the basis of people’s relation with Deaf culture (Glickman & Carey 1993).”

    From Identity construction among deaf adolescents and young adults: A literature review (2023) · cites this paper as Glickman & Carey 1993

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glickman, N. S., & Carey, J. C.
Venue
Rehabilitation Psychology
Published
1993
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
275-283
ISSN
  • 1939-1544
  • 0090-5550
Cited by
50
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review