Cited by 78Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsHemispheric Asymmetry in NeuroscienceNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Searching for Patterns in Random Sequences.

Wolford, George, Newman, Sarah E., Miller, Michael B., Wig, Gagan S.·2004·Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale

Abstract

In a probability-guessing paradigm, participants predict which of two events will occur on each trial. Participants generally frequency match even though frequency matching is nonoptimal with random sequences. The optimal strategy is to guess the most frequent event, maximizing. We hypothesize that frequency matching results from a search for patterns, even in random sequences. Using both callisotomy patients and patients with frontal brain damage, Wolford, Miller, and Gazzaniaga (2000) found frequency matching in the left hemisphere but maximizing in the right hemisphere. In this paper, we show that a secondary task that competes for left hemisphere resources moves the participants toward maximizing but that a right-hemisphere task preserves frequency matching. We also show that a misunderstanding of randomness contributes to frequency matching.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0087446

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 19 · Cited by 78

Authors
Wolford, G., Newman, S. E., Miller, M. B., & Wig, G. S.
Affiliations
  • Dartmouth College (US)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Venue
Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale
Published
2004-12
Volume
58
Issue
4
Pages
221-228
ISSN
  • 1196-1961 (ISSN-L)
  • 1878-7290
OpenAlex
W2100592952
Cited by
78
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS17778)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
frequency matching, maximization, random sequences, pattern search, hemispheric lateralization, secondary task interference
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Humans, Functional Laterality, Memory, Mental Processes, Probability, Space Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review