Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 43Free Will and AgencyNarrative Theory and AnalysisPhilosophical Ethics and Theory

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The narrative quality of action.

Sarbin, Theodore R.·1990·Theoretical & Philosophical Psychology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0091497

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Cited by

See all 43

Metadata

Authors
Sarbin, T. R.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
Corresponding author
Sarbin, Theodore R.
Venue
Theoretical & Philosophical Psychology
Published
1990
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
49-65
ISSN
1068-8455 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089310310
Cited by
43
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 9 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Theoretical & Philosophical Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Free Will and Agency
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Narrative Theory and Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Keywords
narrative quality, action, narrative psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The narrative quality of action. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/h0091497
The paper
Sarbin, T. R. (1990). The narrative quality of action. Theoretical & Philosophical Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0091497

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.