The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A comparative and analytical study of visual depth perception.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Integrative Action of the Nervous System.
Sherrington, C. (1907) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-190734120-00021 · Cited by 4,136
Perception and the Representative Design of Psychological Experiments
Brunswik, E. (1956) · doi:10.1525/9780520350519 · Cited by 2,974
Cited by
(1973) · Cited by 2,004
Movement-produced stimulation in the development of visually guided behavior.
Held, R., & Hein, A. (1963) · Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0040546 · Cited by 1,161
Number Sense as Situated Knowing in a Conceptual Domain
Greeno, J. G. (1991) · Journal for Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.2307/749074 · Cited by 521
EMOTIONS AS BEHAVIOR REGULATORS: SOCIAL REFERENCING IN INFANCY
KLINNERT, M. D., CAMPOS, J. J., SORCE, J. F., EMDE, R. N., & SVEJDA, M. (1983) · Emotions in Early Development · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-558702-0.50009-1 · Cited by 373
Schneirla, T. C. (1965) · Advances in the Study of Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0065-3454(08)60055-8 · Cited by 308
Metadata
- Authors
- Walk, R. D., & Gibson, E. J.
- Venue
- Psychological Monographs: General and Applied
- Published
- 1961
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 1-44
- ISSN
- 0096-9753 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072474480
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparative and analytical study of visual depth perception. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/h0093827
- The paper
- Walk, R. D., & Gibson, E. J. (1961). A comparative and analytical study of visual depth perception. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093827
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
