The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dimensions of therapist response as causal factors in therapeutic change.
Abstract
This study is a preliminary attempt to connect cause and effect in the therapy process. Its chief stimulus and theoretical base is Rogers' conception of the necessary conditions for therapeutic change. Specifically, it begins with the proposition that therapeutic personality change occurs in proportion to the degree that the client experiences certain qualities in his therapist's response to him. The total sample consisted of 42 clients in the Counseling Center of the University of Chicago, and their 21 separate therapists. Subjects answered the Relationship Inventory after five therapy interviews, and at predetermined later points. The main experimental hypotheses were, in essence: (a) that each relationship factor as measured after five interviews would significantly predict the indices of change, and that these predictions would be stronger when the relationship was measured from client perceptions than when it was measured from therapist perceptions and (b) that results for two matched, "equivalent" groups of clients, with relatively "expert" and "nonexpert" therapists would reveal that cases with experts give higher scores on each relationship measure and show evidence of greater change than the cases with nonexperts. The two principal hypotheses were essentially confirmed throughout, by the results obtained, for four of the measured variables of relationship. Although the findings to date are consistently promising in their support of the theory under investigation, future need for extended development of this theory is envisaged.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change.
Rogers, C. R. (1957) · Journal of Consulting Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0045357 · Cited by 5,599
A personality scale of manifest anxiety
Taylor, J. A. (1953) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0056264 · Cited by 3,131
Cited by
Development and validation of the working alliance inventory
Horvath, A. O., & Greenberg, L. S. (1989) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-0167.36.2.223 · Cited by 3,520
Relation between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis
Horvath, A. O., & Symonds, B. D. (1991) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.38.2.139 · Cited by 2,673
Physician Empathy: Definition, Components, Measurement, and Relationship to Gender and Specialty
Hojat, M., Gonnella, J. S., Nasca, T. J., Mangione, S., Vergare, M., & Magee, M. (2002) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.159.9.1563 · Cited by 1,313
The destructiveness of perfectionism: implications for the treatment of depression.
Blatt, S. J. (1995) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.50.12.1003 · Cited by 926
Naturalistic social cognition: Empathic accuracy in mixed-sex dyads.
Ickes, W., Stinson, L., Bissonnette, V., & Garcia, S. (1990) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.4.730 · Cited by 523
Metadata
- Authors
- Barrett-Lennard, G. T.
- Venue
- Psychological Monographs: General and Applied
- Published
- 1962
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 43
- Pages
- 1-36
- ISSN
- 0096-9753 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2057494997
- Cited by
- 838
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Funders
- Ford Foundation
- United States Public Health Service
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dimensions of therapist response as causal factors in therapeutic change. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/h0093918
- The paper
- Barrett-Lennard, G. T. (1962). Dimensions of therapist response as causal factors in therapeutic change. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093918
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.