The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Coping with secondary traumatic stress: Differences between U.K. and U.S. child exploitation personnel.
Abstract
Research investigating how secondary traumatic stress impacts those who work in the field of child exploitation is in its early stages. In the current study we investigate how attempts to cope with secondary traumatic stress vary between investigators in the United States and their counterparts in the United Kingdom. After examining the best-fitting models we found both similarities and differences in predictors of secondary traumatic stress. For example, the level of self-reported difficulty and frequency of interactions with disturbing media were positively related to higher secondary traumatic stress scores in both groups; supervisory support, however, was related to lower secondary traumatic stress scores only in the U.S. sample. The implications and limitations of our findings are discussed. Language: en
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Nevertheless, this study suggests the psychological impacts experienced by commercial CMs are comparable to those experienced by professionals such as first responders and police tasked with analysing child exploitation material (Greinacher et al., 2019; Bourke & Craun, 2014).”
From The psychological impacts of content moderation on content moderators: A qualitative study (2023) · cites this paper as Bourke & Craun, 2014
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The psychological impacts of content moderation on content moderators: A qualitative study
Spence, R., Bifulco, A., Bradbury, P., Martellozzo, E., & DeMarco, J. (2023) · Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace · doi:10.5817/cp2023-4-8 · Cited by 48
“Lastly, police officers who specialise in internet child exploitation and are repeatedly exposed to images and videos of child abuse as part of their investigations show raised rates of STS, mental health difficulties and absenteeism (Bourke & Craun, 2014; Ralph, 2020).”
BackgroundContent Moderators’ Strategies for Coping with the Stress of Moderating Content Online
Spence, R., Harrison, A., Bradbury, P., Bleakley, P., Martellozzo, E., & DeMarco, J. (2023) · Journal of Online Trust and Safety · doi:10.54501/jots.v1i5.91 · Cited by 25
Content Moderator Mental Health, Secondary Trauma, and Well-being: A Cross-Sectional Study
Spence, R., Bifulco, A., Bradbury, P., Martellozzo, E., & DeMarco, J. (2024) · Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2023.0298 · Cited by 29
Woodhams, J., & Duran, F. (2024) · Communications Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44271-024-00060-1 · Cited by 16
Conway, P., Redmond, T., Lundrigan, S., Davy, D., Bailey, S., & Lee, P. (2024) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1155/da/1854312 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Bourke, M. L., & Craun, S. W.
- Venue
- Traumatology: An International Journal
- Published
- 2014-03
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 57-64
- ISSN
- 1085-9373 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2012016496
- Cited by
- 78
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 2.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Traumatology An International Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
- Keywords
- secondary traumatic stress, coping, supervisor support, cross-national comparison, United States, United Kingdom, occupational injuries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coping with secondary traumatic stress: Differences between U.K. and U.S. child exploitation personnel. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/h0099381
- The paper
- Bourke, M. L., & Craun, S. W. (2014). Coping with secondary traumatic stress: Differences between U.K. and U.S. child exploitation personnel. Traumatology: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099381