The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recovery: the lived experience of rehabilitation
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The ACT model is compatible with conceptualisations of recovery from severe mental illness (defined as 'living a satisfying, hopeful and contributing life even with limitations caused by the illness', Anthony, 1993; and 'having a sense of purpose and direction', Deegan, 1988), and therefore well-suited for people with psychosis.”
From The feasibility and acceptability of a brief Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) group intervention for people with psychosis: The ‘ACT for Life’ study (2016) · cites this paper as Deegan, 1988
Citations
Cites
Vanier, J. (1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 74
Human Development and Human Possibility: Erikson in the Light of Heidegger
Knowles, R. T. (1986) · Cited by 43
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Recovery from mental illness: the guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s
Anthony, W. A. (1993) · Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal · doi:10.1037/h0095655 · Cited by 3,700
A Handbook for the Study of Mental Health Second Edition
Scheid, T. L., & Brown, T. N. (2009) · Cited by 1,320
Mental health stigma as social attribution: Implications for research methods and attitude change.
Corrigan, P. W. (2000) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1093/clipsy.7.1.48 · Cited by 954
“As a result, the Kraepelinian prognosis for schizophrenia was poor and hope for the future was negligible (Anthony, 1994; Deegan, 1988).”
BackgroundWhat Is Recovery? A Conceptual Model and Explication
Jacobson, N., & Greenley, D. (2001) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.52.4.482 · Cited by 888
The experience of recovery from schizophrenia: Towards an empirically validated stage model
Andresen, R., Oades, L., & Caputi, P. (2003) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1046/j.1440-1614.2003.01234.x · Cited by 871
“The final literature review included 28 published experiential accounts of recovery from schizophrenia or serious mental illness [15,27-53], 14 articles on recovery written by consumers [1,54-66]”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Deegan, P. E.
- Corresponding author
- Deegan, Patricia E.
- ORCID
- Deegan, Patricia E.
- Venue
- Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal
- Published
- 1988-04
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 11-19
- ISSN
- 0147-5622 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2331066491
- Cited by
- 1,541
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 36 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 80 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 92 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 80 · 2014: 81 · 2013: 62 · 2012: 84
- FWCI
- 6.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Keywords
- recovery, lived experience, psychosocial rehabilitation, mental health recovery
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
