An experimental investigation of responsibility and reassurance: Relationships with compulsive checking
Open accessAbstract
Inflated perceptions of responsibility are hypothesized to contribute to compulsive checking. Reassurance seeking, proposed to be a form of checking, may exacerbate checking behaviour in the long run. A sample of non-clinical participants (N = 100) performed a complex manual classification task under 1 of 4 experimental conditions: high responsibility-high reassurance, high responsibility-low reassurance, low responsibility-high reassurance, or low responsibility-low reassurance, and provided ratings of anxiety, urges to check, urges to seek reassurance, and confidence both before and after experimental manipulations were employed. Higher levels of perceived responsibility were associated with the maintenance of compulsive urges and doubt. Results are discussed in terms of cognitive and behavioural models of obsessive-compulsive disorder, and in terms of directions for future research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is substantial evidence that inflated responsibility is involved in various manifestations of anxiety.
“There is ample evidence that inflated responsibility is involved in various manifestations of anxiety (Obsessive Compulsive Cognitions Working Group, 2001, Leonhart and Radomsky, 2019, Parrish and Radomsky, 2006)”
From Fear and Anxiety in COVID-19: Preexisting Anxiety Disorders (2021) · cites this paper as Parrish and Radomsky, 2006
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 27 · Cited by 38
- Authors
- Parrish, C. L., & Radomsky, A. S.
- ORCID
- Radomsky, Adam S.
- Venue
- International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 174-191
- ISSN
- 1555-7855 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2048165995
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Spectrum Research Repository (Concordia University) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
- Keywords
- compulsive checking, reassurance seeking, perceived responsibility, inflated responsibility, obsessive-compulsive disorder, anxiety, confidence, doubt, cognitive models of OCD
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review