African American Experiences in Healthcare: I Always Feel like I’m Getting Skipped Over
Abstract
Objective Although African Americans perceive discrimination in health care settings, experience higher levels of medical mistrust compared with European Americans, and experience poorer communication with health care providers, little is known as to how these barriers to quality patient-provider relationships arise and manifest themselves. This study examined experiences of African American community members regarding these barriers and additionally explored participants' perspectives on race in the patient-provider relationship. Methods Focus groups were conducted as part of a study exploring participants' experiences and relationships in health care settings. Sixty African American adults were recruited through community settings and activities to participate in 1 of 9 focus groups segmented by gender. Transcripts were reviewed for content related to perceived discrimination, mistrust, poor communication, and race discordance. Themes providing insight into participants' subjective experience of these potential relationship barriers were derived through qualitative coding (using NVivo 10) and iterative discussion. Results Perceived discrimination arose when African American patients, particularly women, felt their symptoms or problems were discredited. Medical mistrust occurred when clinicians did not convey respect to patients, leaving patients to wonder whether their clinician's treatment was discriminatory or not. Poor communication arose when clinicians did not acknowle…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some patients who perceived discrimination due to their race and gender reported feeling the service they received was rushed or skipped over, complicating trust building and communication.
“some patients who perceived discrimination due to their race and gender reported feeling the service they received was rushed or “skipped over,” complicating trust building and communication [67].”
From Toward Safer Diagnoses: A SEIPS-Based Narrative Review of Diagnostic Errors (2026) · cites this paper as [67]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 49 · Cited by 258
- Authors
- Cuevas, A. G., O'Brien, K., & Saha, S.
- Affiliations
- Portland State University (US)
- Portland VA Medical Center (US)
- Venue
- Health Psychology
- Published
- 2016-09
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 987-995
- ISSN
- 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-7810
- OpenAlex
- W2383108889
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 18.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PDXScholar (Portland State University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
- Keywords
- African Americans, patient-provider relationship, perceived discrimination, medical mistrust, patient-provider communication, racial disparities in health care, gender differences, health care access, patient experience
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Black or African American, Emotions, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Perception, Physician-Patient Relations, Quality of Health Care, Focus Groups, Healthcare Disparities, Social Discrimination
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review