The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Associations of depression and diabetes distress with self-management behavior and glycemic control.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the independent associations of depression and diabetes distress with self-management and glycemic outcome in Type I (T1DM) and Type 2 diabetes (T2DM). METHOD: Six hundred six people with T1DM or T2DM participated in a cross-sectional survey including measures of depression (PHQ-9), diabetes distress (PAID-5), self-management behavior (DSMQ), and glycemic outcome (HbA1c). Structural equation modeling was performed to analyze the independent linear associations (standardized coefficients) between these variables. RESULTS: In those with T1DM (n = 339), both depressive symptoms and diabetes distress were associated with lower self-management (-0.34, p < .001, and -0.16, p = .007, respectively) and thereover (indirectly) with higher HbA1c (0.20, p < .001, and 0.10, p = .016, respectively); direct associations with HbA1c were not observed. In those with T2DM (n = 267), only depressive symptoms were associated with lower self-management (-0.41, p < .001) and thus (indirectly) with higher HbA1c (0.17, p < .001). Diabetes distress, by contrast, was directly associated with higher HbA1c (0.20, p = .003) but not with self-management. CONCLUSIONS: The results are consistent with the hypothesis that depression is linked to less optimal diabetes self-management, thus leading to less optimal glycemic outcome. The associations were relatively consistent across diabetes types. Diabetes distress was additionally associated with higher glycemic levels, suggesting that people with both depression and diabetes distress might have the least optimal outcome. The conclusions are limited by the cross-sectional study design, self-report assessment of behavior, and potential bias arising from questionnaire measures. Further research is needed to support these findings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Indeed, evidence now suggests that diabetes‐related distress may be more closely linked to glycaemic control than depression. 18 , 19 , 20”
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
SCHMITT, A. J., Kulzer, B., Ehrmann, D., Haak, T., & Hermanns, N. (2022) · Frontiers in Clinical Diabetes and Healthcare · doi:10.3389/fcdhc.2021.823046 · Cited by 70
Self-citationThe role of depression and diabetes distress in glycemic control: A meta-analysis
Ajele, K. W., & Idemudia, E. S. (2025) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112014 · Cited by 67
Mosili, P., Mkhize, B. C., Sibiya, N. H., Ngubane, P. S., & Khathi, A. (2024) · BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care · doi:10.1136/bmjdrc-2022-003218 · Cited by 64
“15 Furthermore, chronic stress associated with diabetes management may contribute to the development of depression.”
BackgroundJenkinson, E., Knoop, I., Hudson, J. L., Moss‐Morris, R., & Hackett, R. A. (2022) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1111/dme.14948 · Cited by 50
Park, H., Cho, Y., Seo, D. H., Ahn, S. H., Hong, S., Suh, Y. J., Chon, S., Woo, J., Baik, S. H., Lee, K. W., et al. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-55901-0 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmitt, A., Bendig, E., Baumeister, H., Hermanns, N., & Kulzer, B.
- Affiliations
- German Diabetes Center Mergentheim (DE)
- Universität Ulm (DE)
- Venue
- Health Psychology
- Published
- 2021-02
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 113-124
- ISSN
- 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-7810
- OpenAlex
- W3110550372
- Cited by
- 114
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 7
- FWCI
- 7.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- German Center for Diabetes Research (82DZD01101)
- German Diabetes Foundation (375.10.15)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- depression, diabetes distress, diabetes self-management, glycemic control, HbA1c, type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, depressive symptoms, psychosocial factors in diabetes
- MeSH terms
- Self-Management, Glycemic Control, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review