Do they matter? A meta-analytic investigation of individual characteristics and guilt judgments.

Cites (288)

Items 201–287 of 287

1. Effects of judicial instructions and case characteristics in a mock jury trial of battered women who kill.
   Cheryl A Terrance, Kimberly Matheson, Nicholas P. Spaños · 2000 · Law and Human Behavior
2. Juror verdicts as a function of victim and defendant attractiveness in sexual assault cases.
   Mark Erian, Chunqing Lin, Nimesh Patel, Andrew Neal, R. Edward Geiselman · 1998 · American journal of forensic psychology
3. Predicting guilt judgments and verdict change using a measure of pretrial bias in a videotaped mock trial with deliberating jurors
   Len B. Lecci, Bryan Myers · 2009 · Psychology Crime and Law
4. The Effect of Defendant Facial Expression on Mock Juror Decision-Making: The Power of Remorse
   M. Kimberly MacLin, Corynn Downs, Otto H. MacLin, Heather Caspers · 2009 · UNI ScholarWorks (University of Northern Iowa)
5. Juror experience and jury verdicts.
   Ronald C. Dillehay, Michael T. Nietzel · 1985 · Law and Human Behavior
6. Perceptions and Credibility: Understanding the Nuances of Eyewitness Testimony
   Lauren O’Neill Shermer, Karen C. Rose, Ashley Hoffman · 2011 · Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice
7. The Impact of Case Characteristics and Prior Jury Experience on Jury Verdicts1
   Carol M. Werner, Michael Strube, Allen M. Cole, Dorothy K. Kagehiro · 1985 · Journal of Applied Social Psychology
8. Hate Crimes on Trial: Judgments about Violent Crime against Gay Men
   Robert J. Cramer, Emily E. Wakeman, Joseph F. Chandler, Jonathan J. Mohr, Michael P. Griffin · 2011 · Psychiatry Psychology and Law
9. Conviction proneness and the authoritarian juror: Inability to disregard information or attitudinal bias?
   Carol M. Werner, Dorothy K. Kagehiro, Michael Strube · 1982 · Journal of Applied Psychology
10. "Beyond a Reasonable Doubt"—An Experimental Attempt at Quantification
    Rita James Simon · 1970 · The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science
11. NGRI Revisited: Venirepersons' Attitudes Toward the Insanity Defense1
    Brooke M. Butler · 2006 · Journal of Applied Social Psychology
12. Rethinking battered woman syndrome evidence: The impact of alternative forms of expert testimony on mock jurors' decisions.
    Regina A. Schuller, Elisabeth C. Wells, Sara Rzepa, Marc A. Klippenstine · 2004 · Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement
13. Gender differences in jurors’ perceptions of infanticide involving disabled and non-disabled infant victims
    Bette L. Bottoms, Alaine K. Kalder, Margaret C. Stevenson, Barbara Ann Oudekerk, Tisha Wiley, Alison R. Perona · 2011 · Child Abuse & Neglect
14. The influence of mitigation evidence, ethnicity, and SES on death penalty decisions by European American and Latino venire persons.
    Russ K. E. Espinoza, Cynthia Willis Esqueda · 2014 · Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology
15. Perpetrator Personality and Judgments of Acquaintance Rape
    Mark D. Alicke, Tricia J. Yurak · 1995 · Journal of Applied Social Psychology
16. The CSI Effect Reconsidered: Is It Moderated by Need for Cognition?
    Dante E. Mancini · 2011 · North American journal of psychology
17. Nullification instructions and juror guilt ratings: An examination of modern racism.
    Erick L. Hill, Jeffrey E. Pfeifer · 1992
18. The credibility of recovered memory testimony: exploring the effects of alleged victim and perpetrator gender
    Brian H. Bornstein, Stephanie L. Muller · 2001 · Child Abuse & Neglect
19. Verdict, Sentencing, and Certainty as a Function of Sex of Juror and Amount of Evidence in a Simulated Rape Trial
    Kathleen A. McNamara, Frank J. Vattano, Wayne Viney · 1993 · Psychological Reports
20. Measuring knowledge of the insanity defense: Scale construction and validation
    Tarika Daftary‐Kapur, Jennifer Groscup, Maureen O’Connor, Frank Coffaro, Michele Galietta · 2010 · Behavioral Sciences & the Law
21. When a Son Steals Money From His Mother: Courtroom Perceptions of Elder Financial Exploitation
    Jonathan M. Golding, Emily C. Hodell, Emily E. Dunlap, Nesa E. Wasarhaley, Peggy Sue Keller · 2012 · Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect
22. Attribution of Responsibility
    James D. Fry · 2014 · Cambridge University Press eBooks
23. Character structure and jury behavior: Conceptual and applied implications.
    Carol J. Mills, Wayne E. Bohannon · 1980 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
24. The effect of gender in the perception of elder physical abuse in court.
    Jonathan M. Golding, John A. Yozwiak, Terri L. Kinstle, Dorothy F. Marsil · 2005 · Law and Human Behavior
25. When Jurors Consider Recovered Memory Cases
    Holly L. Clark, Narina Nunez Nightingale · 1997 · Journal of Offender Rehabilitation
26. Juror decision making: A case of attitude change mediated by authoritarianism
    John Lamberth, Edith Krieger, Susanne Shay · 1982 · Journal of Research in Personality
27. EXPRESSIONS OF MODERN RACISM IN JUDGMENTS OF OTHERS: THE ROLE OF TASK AND TARGET SPECIFICITY ON ATTRIBUTIONS OF GUILT
    Jeffrey E. Pfeifer, Daniel J. Bernstein · 2003 · Social Behavior and Personality An International Journal
28. Asymmetries in prior conviction reasoning: truth suppression effects in child protection contexts
    Michelle Cowley, Juliette Colyer · 2010 · Psychology Crime and Law
29. The Impact of Expert Testimony in Trials of Battered Women Who Kill
    Regina A. Schuller, Blake M. McKimmie, Teresa A. Janz · 2004 · Psychiatry Psychology and Law
30. Perceptions of Elder Neglect in the Courtroom
    Jonathan M. Golding, Jennifer Allen, John A. Yozwiak, Dorothy F. Marsil, Terri L. Kinstle · 2004 · Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect
31. Perceptions of Elder Physical Abuse in the Courtroom: The Influence of Hearsay Witness Testimony
    Emily E. Dunlap, Jonathan M. Golding, Emily C. Hodell, Dorothy F. Marsil · 2007 · Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect
32. Talking about a Black Man: The Influence of Defendant and Character Witness Race on Jurors' Use of Character Evidence
    Evelyn M. Maeder, Jennifer S. Hunt · 2011 · Behavioral Sciences & the Law
33. Effects of Native American Race, Intoxication, and Crime Severity on Judgments of Guilt
    Cindy Struckman‐Johnson, Michael G. Miller, David Struckman‐Johnson · 2008 · Journal of Applied Social Psychology
34. Perceptions of Sexual Assault: The Expression of Gender Differences and the Impact of Target Alcohol Consumption1
    Marc A. Klippenstine, Regina A. Schuller, Ann‐Marie Wall · 2007 · Journal of Applied Social Psychology
35. The Perception of Elder Sexual Abuse in the Courtroom
    Emily C. Hodell, Jonathan M. Golding, John A. Yozwiak, Gregory S. Bradshaw, Terri L. Kinstle, Dorothy F. Marsil · 2009 · Violence Against Women
36. Battered Women Who Kill: Variables Affecting Simulated Jurors' Verdicts
    Jane Braden-Maguire, Janet A. Sigal, Carrol S. Perrino · 2005 · Journal of Family Violence
37. Some individual differences in perception of the evidence and the verdict choice
    Emilia Inmaculada de la Fuente Solana, Juan García García, Ignacio Martín Tamayo · 1998 · Psychology Crime and Law
38. Pretrial publicity and juror age affect mock-juror decision making.
    Ruva, Christine L., Hudak, Elizabeth M. · 2013 · Psychology, Crime & Law
39. Crime Victims Serving as Jurors: Is There Bias Present?
    Scott Edward Culhane, Harmon M. Hosch, William G. Weaver · 2004 · Law and Human Behavior
40. AN ATTRIBUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF JURORS' JUDGMENTS IN A CRIMINAL CASE: A PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION
    Jacqueline R. Pope, Robert G. Meyer · 1999 · Social Behavior and Personality An International Journal
41. Effects of Sex and Race of Perpetrator and Method of Killing on Outcome Judgments in a Mock Filicide Case
    Kerri F. Dunn, Gloria A. Cowan, Daniel M. Downs · 2006 · Journal of Applied Social Psychology
42. Preventing the Application of Stereotypic Biases in the Courtroom: The Role of Detailed Testimony1
    Melinda Jones · 1997 · Journal of Applied Social Psychology
43. The Influence of Race, Heuristics, and Information Load on Judgments of Guilt and Innocence
    Ron Tamborini, Ren-He Huang, Dana E. Mastro, Reiko Nabashi-Nakahara · 2007 · Communication Studies
44. Judges and Juries: The Defense Case and Differences in Acquittal Rates
    Daniel James Givelber, Amy S. Farrell · 2008 · Law & Social Inquiry
45. The Impact of Juror Characteristics and Victim Health Status on the Perception of Elder Physical Abuse
    Terri L. Kinstle, Emily C. Hodell, Jonathan M. Golding · 2008 · Journal of Interpersonal Violence
46. Deliberating about terrorism: Prejudice and jury verdicts in a mock terrorism trial
    David S. Tait · 2011 · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology
47. A Comparison of Anglo‐American and Mexican‐American Jurors' Judgments of Mothers Who Fail to Protect Their Children from Abuse1
    Harmon M. Hosch, Gloria J Chanez-Trejo, Robert K. Bothwell, Henry Munoz · 1991 · Journal of Applied Social Psychology
48. How do jurors argue with one another?
    Joshua P. Warren, Deanna Kuhn · 2010 · Judgment and Decision Making
49. Behind the Veil of Juror Decision Making
    Evelyn M. Maeder, Julie L. Dempsey, Joanna Pozzulo · 2012 · Criminal Justice and Behavior
50. Factors impacting juror perceptions of battered women who kill their abusers: Delay and sleeping status.
    Emily C. Hodell, Emily E. Dunlap, Nesa E. Wasarhaley, Jonathan M. Golding · 2011 · Psychology Public Policy and Law
51. The effects of eyeglasses and race on juror decisions involving a violent crime.
    Michael J. Brown, Ernesto Henriquez, Jennifer Groscup · 2008 · American journal of forensic psychology
52. JURIES, FOREMEN AND VERDICTS
    John F. Baldwin, Michael McConville · 1980 · The British Journal of Criminology
53. Forensic Psychology: Perception of Guilt and Income
    Robert I. Gordon, Paul Jacobs · 1969 · Perceptual and Motor Skills
54. Mock juror sensitivity to forensic evidence in drug facilitated sexual assaults
    Regina A. Schuller, Alison Ryan, Daniel A. Krauss, Gwen Jenkins · 2013 · International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
55. Mock Jurors’ Evaluations of Child Sexual Abuse: The Impact of Memory Recovery and Therapeutic Intervention
    Iris Tetford, Regina A. Schuller · 1996 · Behavioral Sciences & the Law
56. Polygraph Evidence and Juror Judgments: The Effects of Corroborating Evidence1
    Bryan Myers, Angela Rosol, Eric W. Boelter · 2003 · Journal of Applied Social Psychology
57. Jurors' Responses To Unusual Inadmissible Evidence
    Kerri L. Pickel, Tanya J. Karam, Todd C. Warner · 2009 · Criminal Justice and Behavior
58. How Processing Resources Shape the Influence of Stealing Thunder on Mock-Juror Verdicts
    M. Howard, N. Brewer, K. Williams · 2006 · Psychiatry Psychology and Law
59. The Effects of Using Social Scientific Rape Typologies on Juror Decisions to Convict
    Henry F. Fradella, Kegan Brown · 2007
60. Trawling Genetic Databases: When a DNA Match is Just a Naked Statistic
    Nicholas Scurich, Richard S. John · 2011 · Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
61. Jurors' reactions to satanic ritual abuse allegations
    Bette L. Bottoms, Kathleen R. Diviak, Suzanne L. Davis · 1997 · Child Abuse & Neglect
62. Mock Jurors' Behavior as a Function of Sex and Exposure to an Educational Videotape about Jury Duty
    Arthur W. Lyons, Joanne Regina · 1986 · Psychological Reports
63. An Examination of a Potential Reform to the Provocation Defence: The Impact of Gender of the Defendant and the Suddenness Requirement
    Nicola Cheyne, Susan M. Dennison · 2005 · Psychiatry Psychology and Law
64. Admitting evidence of a defendant's previous conviction (PCE) and its impact on juror deliberation in relation to both juror‐processing style and juror concerns over the fairness of introducing PCE
    TERRY M. HONESS, Greta A. Mathews · 2011 · Legal and Criminological Psychology
65. “Recipe for a Jury” Revisited: A Balance Theory Prediction
    Stuart P. Fischoff · 1979 · Journal of Applied Social Psychology
66. Moving beyond Ford, Atkins, and Roper: jurors' attitudes toward the execution of the elderly and the physically disabled
    Brooke M. Butler · 2010 · Psychology Crime and Law
67. The Influence of Nondiagnostic Information and Victim Stereotypes on Perceptions of Guilt
    Daniel M. Rempala, Andrew L. Geers · 2011
68. The Law and Information Processing: Implications for Verdicts in Rape Cases1
    Julie A. Allison · 1996 · Journal of Applied Social Psychology
69. Is "More" Mitigation "Better?" A Comparison of the Additive and Averaging Models in Capital Cases
    Brooke M. Butler, Gary P. Moran · 2009 · American journal of forensic psychology
70. Juries, Sex, and Emotional Affect
    Charles A. Elliott · 2011 · Law & psychology review
71. A Model of Social Influence During Group Discussion: An Application With Four- and Six-Person Mock Juries
    Garold L. Stasser · 1977 · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)
72. Race salience in defense attorney opening and closing statements: The effects of ambiguity and juror attitudes
    Donald Bucolo · 2007 · University of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester)
73. Gruesome evidence: Probative or prejudicial? The effect of probative versus non-probative photographs and defendant race on jurors’ verdicts
    Jessica M. Salerno, Liana Claudia Peter-Hagene · 2011
74. The effect of SANE testimony on juror perceptions during a child sexual assault trial
    Theresa A. Simcic, Nesa E. Wasarhaley, Jonathan M. Golding · 2011
75. Hot or Not? The Influence of Attorney Attractiveness and Gender on Juror Decision Making
    Krystia Reed, Jennifer Groscup · 2010
76. How age and race of defendant and victim influence mock jurors' perceptions in a child sexual molestation case
    Guadalupe Escamilla · 2001 · ThinkTech (Texas Tech University)
77. Personal beliefs and public print: The influence of pre-existing attitudes and pretrial publicity information on final verdicts
    Sara M. Locatelli · 2011 · Loyola eCommons (Loyola University of Chicago)
78. The effects of defendant race and SES, and defense attorney race on juror decision making: An aversive racism explanation for prejudice against Mexican Americans
    Russ K. E. Espinoza · 2005 · Lincoln (University of Nebraska)
79. Social recognition memory and the cross-race effect
    Brooke Alison Smith · 2008 · scholarworks - UTEP (The University of Texas at El Paso)
80. Battered woman syndrome: Juror common understanding and expert testimony
    Mindy B. Mechanic · 1996 · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)
81. Socioeconomic Status Affects Perceptions of Juvenile Defendants in Adult Criminal Court
    Katlyn Sorenson Farnum, Margaret C. Stevenson · 2010
82. The effects of inquisitorial versus adversarial cross-examination on juror evaluations of expert evidence validity
    Jacqueline L. Austin, Margaret Bull Kovera · 2010
83. The influence of socioeconomic status and reciprocity on mock jurors' verdicts in a hypothetical rape case
    Deryck D'Arcy Richardson · 1979 · OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)
84. Veterans on Trial: Juror Attitudes and Behaviors Toward Veterans With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
    Jennifer O. Kelly, Stanley L. Brodsky · 2011 · PsycEXTRA Dataset
85. Defendant age and alibi corroboration: Do these variables interact to influence jurors' perceptions and verdicts?
    Jennifer L. Pettalia, Joanna Pozzulo, Julie L. Dempsey, Amanda Gooden · 2013 · PsycEXTRA Dataset
86. The Influence of Defendant Weight and Gender on Juror Decision-Making
    Annik M. Mossière, Evelyn M. Maeder, Dylan Brown · 2013 · PsycEXTRA Dataset
87. Playing the race card: Making race salient in defense opening and closing statements
    Donald Bucolo, Cohn, Ellen S. · 2010 · University of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester)