The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Criterion shifting in an unfamiliar face-matching task: Effects of base rates, payoffs, and perceptual discriminability
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Individuals with lower face-matching ability adopt more extreme criteria when there are more match than mismatch trials, or the cost of mismatch errors is high.
“Individuals with lower face-matching ability adopt more extreme criteria when there are more match than mismatch trials, or the cost of mismatch errors is high, and as such show higher levels of liberal and conservative tendencies, respectively (Stabile et al., 2024).”
From A criterion-placement theory of face matching (2026) · cites this paper as Stabile et al., 2024
Criterion shifts in face matching have been observed under a range of conditions, including airport context, costs/payoffs/unequal base rates, and superficial image differences.
“Criterion shifts have been observed under a range of conditions, for example, when face matching is performed in an airport context (Bindemann et al., 2022), in response to costs, payoffs and unequal base rates (Baker & Bindemann, 2025;Stabile et al., 2024”
From A criterion-placement theory of face matching (2026) · cites this paper as Stabile et al., 2024
Participants who complete trials comprising other-race faces show greater shifts in criterion when faced with unequal costs and base rates compared to participants who complete trials comprising only own-race faces.
“when faced with unequal costs and base rates they show greater shifts in criterion”
From A criterion-placement theory of face matching (2026) · cites this paper as Stabile et al., 2024
Participants who complete trials comprising other-race faces show poorer performance compared to participants who complete trials comprising only own-race faces.
“Compared to participants who complete trials comprising only own-race faces, participants who complete trials comprising other-race faces show poorer performance”
From A criterion-placement theory of face matching (2026) · cites this paper as Stabile et al., 2024
Criterion is influenced by task difficulty and the relative frequency with which matches and mismatches occur.
“criterion is influenced by task difficulty and the relative frequency with which matches and mismatches occur (e.g., Baker & Bindemann, 2025;Stabile et al., 2024)”
From A criterion-placement theory of face matching (2026) · cites this paper as Stabile et al., 2024
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A criterion-placement theory of face matching
Baker, K. A., Mondloch, C. J., Hancock, P. J. B., & Bindemann, M. (2026) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106319 · Cited by 5
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Stabile, V. J., Baker, K. A., & Mondloch, C. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
- Published
- 2024-12
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 569-581
- ISSN
- 2211-369X
- 2211-3681
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (RGPIN 2022-04386)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
