Cited by 43Gender Roles and Identity StudiesCancer survivorship and careGender and Feminist Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

Measuring masculinity in the context of chronic disease.

Abstract

Masculine beliefs are influential in men’s responses to illness; however, current measures of masculinity may not be salient for highly prevalent chronic diseases such as prostate cancer. To address this gap, a contextualized measure of masculinity for men with prostate cancer was developed. A novel measure of masculinity, the Masculinity in Chronic Disease Inventory (MCD-I), was developed based on existing qualitative data and tested for acceptability and face validity with 19 men previously treated for prostate cancer. A cross-sectional survey of 403 Australian men with prostate cancer (Mage = 70.34 years; SD = 7.25) then assessed convergent, divergent, and discriminant validity for the MCD-I using existing reliable and valid measures of masculinity, masculine self-esteem, quality of life, erectile dysfunction, and sexual help seeking. A 6-factor structure for the MCD-I (22 items) was confirmed with good to excellent internal reliabilities (alpha = 0.69–0.92) for the subscale domains of Strength, Sexual Importance/Priority; Family Responsibilities; Emotional Self-Reliance; Optimistic Capacity; and Action Approach. Acceptable convergent and divergent validity was supported, and the MCD-I was also able to discriminate between men with severe versus moderate to mild erectile dysfunction (p = .002) and the Sexual Importance/Priority domain discriminated between men who had sought sexual advice and those who had not (p = .005). A contextual approach to measuring masculinity in m…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/men0000018

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 77 · Cited by 43

Metadata

Authors
Chambers, S. K., Hyde, M. K., Oliffe, J. L., Zajdlewicz, L., Lowe, A., Wootten, A. C., & Dunn, J.
Affiliations
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Cancer Council Queensland (AU)
  • Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia (AU)
  • Australian Prostate Centre (AU)
Venue
Psychology of Men & Masculinity
Published
2016-07
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
228-242
ISSN
  • 1524-9220 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-151X
OpenAlex
W2224325084
Cited by
43
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4
FWCI
10.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology of Men & Masculinity (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland) (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Australian Research Council
  • Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
masculinity, prostate cancer, erectile dysfunction, quality of life, men's health, chronic disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review