The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A more general model for testing measurement invariance and differential item functioning
Open accessAbstract
The evaluation of measurement invariance is an important step in establishing the validity and comparability of measurements across individuals. Most commonly, measurement invariance has been examined using 1 of 2 primary latent variable modeling approaches: the multiple groups model or the multiple-indicator multiple-cause (MIMIC) model. Both approaches offer opportunities to detect differential item functioning within multi-item scales, and thereby to test measurement invariance, but both approaches also have significant limitations. The multiple groups model allows 1 to examine the invariance of all model parameters but only across levels of a single categorical individual difference variable (e.g., ethnicity). In contrast, the MIMIC model permits both categorical and continuous individual difference variables (e.g., sex and age) but permits only a subset of the model parameters to vary as a function of these characteristics. The current article argues that moderated nonlinear factor analysis (MNLFA) constitutes an alternative, more flexible model for evaluating measurement invariance and differential item functioning. We show that the MNLFA subsumes and combines the strengths of the multiple group and MIMIC models, allowing for a full and simultaneous assessment of measurement invariance and differential item functioning across multiple categorical and/or continuous individual difference variables. The relationships between the MNLFA model and the multiple groups and MIMIC models are shown mathematically and via an empirical demonstration. (PsycINFO Database Record
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Using an Integrative Data Analysis/Moderated NonLinear Factor Analysis (IDA/MNLFA) framework (Bauer, 2017; Hussong et al., 2020), a PTSD severity score was created from clinical interviews and self-report measures used to assess PTSD in the individual parent studies (Hien et al., 2022).”
From Cannabis use and trauma-focused treatment for co-occurring posttraumatic stress disorder and substance use disorders: A meta-analysis of individual patient data (2024) · cites this paper as Bauer, 2017
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy
Moffitt, T. E. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.4.674 · Cited by 9,987
On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables.
MacCallum, R. C., Zhang, S., Preacher, K. J., & Rucker, D. D. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.19 · Cited by 3,538 · cited 1×
“Additionally, any continuous characteristics would have to be discretized (e.g., by a median split), a practice that can reduce power and bias estimates (MacCallum et al., 2002).”
Ensuring Positiveness of the Scaled Difference Chi-square Test Statistic
Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2009) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-009-9135-y · Cited by 2,880
A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research
Horn, J. L., & Mcardle, J. J. (1992) · Experimental Aging Research · doi:10.1080/03610739208253916 · Cited by 1,592
KEY ISSUES IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF AGGRESSION AND VIOLENCE FROM CHILDHOOD TO EARLY ADULTHOOD
Loeber, R., & Hay, D. F. (1997) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.371 · Cited by 1,259
Hedeker, D., Mermelstein, R. J., & Demirtaş, H. (2007) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00924.x · Cited by 333
Bauer, D. J., & Hussong, A. M. (2009) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0015583 · Cited by 282
Self-citationEvaluation of MIMIC-Model Methods for DIF Testing With Comparison to Two-Group Analysis
Woods, C. M. (2009) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273170802620121 · Cited by 196
Steinberg, L., & Thissen, D. (2006) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.11.4.402 · Cited by 186
Where Is the Syndrome? Examining Co-Occurrence Among Multiple Problem Behaviors in Adolescence.
Willoughby, T., Chalmers, H., & Busseri, M. A. (2004) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.72.6.1022 · Cited by 161
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Byrne BM Shavelson RJ Muthén B 1989 Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance Psychological Bulletin 105 456 466
- Farrington DP 1986 Age and crime Tonry M Morris N Crime and justice: An annual review of research 7 189 250 Chicago University of Chicago Press
- Jöreskog KG Goldberger AS 1975 Estimation of a model with multiple indicators and multiple causes of a single latent variable Journal of the American Statistical Association 70 631 639
- Lewis M 2007 Early Emotional Development Slater A Lewis M Introduction to Infant Development 2 216 232 England Oxford University Press
- Mellenbergh GJ 1989 Item bias and item response theory International Journal of Educational Research 13 127 143
- Millsap RE 2011 Statistical approaches to measurement invariance New York, NY Routledge
- Molinengo G Testa S 2010 Analysis of the psychometric properties of an assessment tool for deviant behavior in adolescence European Journal of Psychological Assessment 26 108 115
- Sörbom D 1974 A general method for studying differences in factor means and factor structure between groups British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 27 229 239
- Thissen D Steinberg L Gerrard M 1986 Beyond group-mean differences: The concept of item bias Psychological Bulletin 99 118 128
- Thissen D Steinberg L Kuang D 2002 Quick and easy implementation of the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure for controlling the false positive rate in multiple comparisons Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 27 77 83
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–363 of 363
Chen, Y., Sideris, J. H., Watson, L. R., Crais, E. R., & Baranek, G. T. (2025) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/10731911241306360
Assessing Longitudinal Measurement Invariance for the Short Christian Orthodoxy Scale
Matsuo, H., Greenway, T. S., Dougherty, K. D., & Schnitker, S. A. (2025) · International Journal for the Psychology of Religion · doi:10.1080/10508619.2025.2456888
Dynamic Measurement Invariance Cutoffs for Two-Group Fit Index DifferencesPreprint
McNeish, D. (2025) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/d6rwx_v2 · Cited by 1
Dynamic Measurement Invariance Cutoffs for Two-Group Fit Index DifferencesPreprint
McNeish, D. (2024) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/d6rwx_v1
Vertical Scaling with Moderated Nonlinear Factor AnalysisPreprint
Student, S. R. (2025) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/tqg39_v2
Somer, E., Falk, C. F., & Miočević, M. (2024) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/bxr54_v1
Somer, E., Falk, C. F., & Miočević, M. (2025) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/bxr54_v3
Jak, S., Cheung, M. W. ‐., Acar, S., & Kindred, R. (2025) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/35gtz_v2
Comment: Item Response Theory—Some Minutiae
Thissen, D. (2025) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/24-sts921
The Infant Behavior Questionnaire Factor Structure Varies With Sample Characteristics
Zhou, A. M., Pérez‐Edgar, K. E., LoBue, V., & Buss, K. A. (2025) · Infancy · doi:10.1111/infa.70030
Schuhbeck, T. M. B., Sterner, P., & Goretzko, D. (2025) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705511.2025.2570447
Principles of Psychological Assessment
Goodby, E., & Haynes, P. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009028967.008
On the Complex Sources of Differential Item Functioning: A Comparison of Three Methods
Lee, H., Huang, S., Svetina, D., & Schwartzman, B. (2025) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/00131644251379802
Lozano, A., Saavedra, L. M., Bautista, T. G., Sánchez, M., Morgan‐López, A. A., & Amaro, H. D. L. A. (2025) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1007/s11121-025-01862-3
Galbraith, K., Beam, C. R., & Huey, S. J. (2025) · Journal of Research on Adolescence · doi:10.1111/jora.70106
Mittal, O., Scherer, R., & Nilsen, T. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.21102265
Mittal, O., Scherer, R., & Nilsen, T. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.21102259
Mittal, O., Scherer, R., & Nilsen, T. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.21102262
Mittal, O., Scherer, R., & Nilsen, T. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.21102256
Moderating the Consequences of Longitudinal Change for Distal Outcomes
McCormick, E. M. (2026) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2026.2613311
Lee, M., & Lee, H.-H. (2026) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs16020207
Huth, N., Vogel, S. C., Goh, P. K., Broussard, A., Perkins, E. R., Paz, Y., Rosellini, A. J., Mills-Koonce, R., Willoughby, M. T., Waller, R. E., et al. (2026) · Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology · doi:10.1007/s10802-026-01431-4
Debelak, R., & Driver, C. (2026) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/01466216261422480
Differential item functioning of the Geriatric Depression Scale‐short form in the NACC dataset
Renn, B. N., Cross, C. L., Zaman, I., Singsank, K. T., Cobos, K., & John, S. E. (2026) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.71114
Huth, N., Vogel, S. C., Cole, V. T., Mills-Koonce, R., Willoughby, M. T., & Wagner, N. J. (2026) · Child Psychiatry & Human Development · doi:10.1007/s10578-026-01976-x
Morrison, M. C., Sharp, J., Hynes, W. T., & Peer, S. O. (2025) · Journal of Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsaf108
An iterative strategy for referent variable selection in MIMIC-interaction modeling
Li, C.-H., & Traynor, A. (2026) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-026-02957-7
Racial–Ethnic Comparisons of ADOS ‐2 Algorithms for Young Verbal Children
Barger, B. D., Moody, E. J., Reyes, N., Rosenberg, S., Rosenberg, C. R., Pretzel, R., Grzadzinski, R., Nadler, C. B., & DiGuiseppi, C. G. (2026) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.70203
Powell, M. Z., Latendresse, S. J., Kennelly, N., Chung, T., & Sartor, C. E. (2026) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/ntag056
Monnier, M., Peyre, H., Périés, M., Simoncic, V., Nicolet, G., Michelon, C., Seetahul, Y., Baghdadli, A., & the Elena Study Group (2026) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.70220
Diemer, M. A., Bui, H., & Holland, N. D. (2026) · Journal of Career Assessment · doi:10.1177/10690727261437111
Chen, S. M., & Bauer, D. J. (2026) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2026.2640576
Self-citationSomer, E., Falk, C. F., & Miočević, M. (2026) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2026.2650840
Sartor, C. E., Powell, M. Z., Kennelly, N., Chung, T., & Latendresse, S. J. (2026) · Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities · doi:10.1007/s40615-026-02938-8
Irmer, J. P., Schermelleh-Engel, K., & Schmidt, P. (2026) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-026-02985-3
Anti-Asian Racism: Developing a Brief, Reliable, and Valid Measure
Lee, D. B., Yang, X., Wu, T., Mouacheupao, I., Zimmerman, M. A., & Hsieh, H. (2026) · Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities · doi:10.1007/s40615-026-02939-7
Longitudinal Modeling of Developmental Dimensional Models of Psychopathology
Olino, T. M., & Wilson, S. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197769676.003.0020
Factor Analysis in Psychopathology Research
Watts, A. L., & Peng, Z. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197769676.003.0015
Mark, T. L., Saavedra, L. M., Kirsch, S., Pogue, Y. Z., Lynch, F. L., Koebnick, C., Morgan‐López, A. A., Yaros, A., & Juel, E. K. (2026) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119157
Sifre, R., & DeJoseph, M. L. (2021) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Negative symptoms of schizophrenia demonstrate measurement bias across sociodemographic variables
Abplanalp, S. J., Strauss, G. P., Bucci, P., Mucci, A., Pezzella, P., & Galderisi, S. (2026) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2026.05.001
Madayag, R. A., Quintos, R. T., & Yumang, J. S. (2026) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2026.113893
Supianto (2026) · The Educational and Developmental Psychologist · doi:10.1080/20590776.2026.2675681
Individual Variability as a Moderator of Latent Structural Relations
Shulkin, J. (2026) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2026.2673280
Fernández, R. S., Presa, J., Acosta, I., Salgado, A. M. R., Sosa, A. L., Acosta, D. M., Jiménez‐Velázquez, I. Z., Meier, I. B., Narayan, V. A., Guerra, M., et al. (2026) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.71504
Vincendon, C., de Graaf, J. A., & Milhabet, I. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6845707
Scott, D., Mutaru, A., Maldonado, I., Junior, H. P. D. O. S., Prado, G. J., & Lozano, A. (2026) · Current Addiction Reports · doi:10.1007/s40429-026-00762-y
Cao, K., Liu, W. T., Yang, L., Luo, M., & Hou, Y. (2026) · Drug Design Development and Therapy · doi:10.2147/dddt.s583986
Why we eat: Development and validation of a 7-factor Motivations for Eating Profile (MEP-7)
Dakin, C. A., Finlayson, G., & Stubbs, R. J. (2026) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2026.108699
The Chopra Wellbeing Index: Examination of Psychometric Properties
Wortham, J. S., Martin, D., Donaldson, S. I., & Howley, C. G. (2026) · The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine · doi:10.1177/00912174261465740
Sisco, A. D., Berlin, K. S., Ellison, V. N., Desai, K. R., Srisarajivakul, E. N., Keenan-Pfeiffer, M. E., Cook, J., Ankney, R. L., Klages, K. L., Semenkovich, K. A., et al. (2026) · Journal of Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsag050
Seiwert, S., Tisseyre, J., & Tallet, J. (2026) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2026.105339
Gao, R., Nicole, S., Carlson, R. G., Hodge, V., Barden, S. M., Taylor, D. D., & Dean, R. (2026) · Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development · doi:10.1080/07481756.2026.2703616
Prakash, K., Morgan‐López, A. A., Gette, J. A., Peck, K. R., Piccirillo, M. L., Saavedra, L. M., Back, S. E., Killeen, T. K., Norman, S. B., West, S. G., et al. (2026) · Journal of Traumatic Stress · doi:10.1002/jts.70112
Investigating Measurement Invariance Across Situations in Intensive Longitudinal Data
Peuckmann, L., Neubauer, A. B., & Reis, D. (2026) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2026.2707651
Developments and Trends in Research of Detecting Multiple Group Differential İtem Functioning
Koç, A. (2026) · Measurement Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives · doi:10.1080/15366367.2026.2714380
Fix, R. L., Raghunathan, R. S., Luo, X. I., & Geller, A. (2026) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/08862605261473590
Song, Z., Qing, Z., & Chen, P. (2026) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1111/bmsp.70073
Campbell, Z. C., Boyes, M. E., Vanluydt, E., Padgett, R. N., Hill, E., Leitão, S., & Griffiths, S. (2026) · Child Development · doi:10.1093/chidev/aacag172
Difference-in-Differences with Latent Variables: A Structural Equation Modeling Framework
Andersen, H. K., & Seddig, D. (2026) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705511.2026.2704192
Schneider, J., Striebing, C., Jacobsen, M. E., & Päßler, K. (2026) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-026-09131-6
Hien, D. A., Blakey, S. M., Norman, S. B., Killeen, T. K., Saavedra, L. M., Back, S. E., López‐Castro, T., Simpson, T. L., Swarbrick, M., Petrakis, I. L., et al. (2026) · European Journal of Psychotraumatology · doi:10.1080/20008066.2026.2715184
Urfa, O., Turner, M. J., & Aşçı, F. H. (2026) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/02640414.2026.2743314
Metadata
- Authors
- Bauer, D. J.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bauer, Daniel J.
- ORCID
- Bauer, Daniel J.
- Venue
- Psychological Methods
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 507-526
- ISSN
- 1082-989X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1463
- PMC
- PMC5140785
- OpenAlex
- W2420991929
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 57 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 9
- FWCI
- 16.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Psychological Methods (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (R01 DA034636)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Keywords
- measurement invariance, differential item functioning, moderated nonlinear factor analysis, latent variable models, measurement validity
- MeSH terms
- Data Collection, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Humans, Psychometrics, Models, Statistical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review