The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The development of goal setting theory: A half century retrospective.
Abstract
This chapter summarizes the authors’ joint development of the goal setting theory. The basic concept was based on more than 50 years of research and the formal theory has endured for 28 years (Locke & Latham, 1990). The theory was not developed through overgeneralization from only a few studies or by deduction but rather by induction. The inductions involved the integration of hundreds of studies involving thousands of participants. The theory initially focused solely on consciously set goals. To date, the goal setting theory has shown generality across participants, tasks, nationality, goal source, settings, experimental designs, outcome variables, levels of analysis (individual, group, division, and organizational), and time spans. The theory identifies both mediators and moderators of goal effects. Numerous subsequent studies since 1990 have supported the main tenets of the theory. New findings have enlarged our knowledge of the relevant mediators and moderators as well as showing new applications (Locke & Latham, 2013). Among these discoveries are when to set learning rather than performance goals, the effect of goals primed in the subconscious on job performance, and that goal effects are enhanced by having people write at length about them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158 · Cited by 46,835
Motivational processes affecting learning.
Dweck, C. S. (1986) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.41.10.1040 · Cited by 6,971
Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives
Locke, E. A. (1968) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(68)90004-4 · Cited by 2,409 · cited 1×
“T hi s ar tic le is in te nd ed so le ly fo r th e pe rs on al us e of th e in di vi du al us er an d is no t to be di ss em in at ed br oa dl y. had the beginning of a theoretical framework for conducting our research and explaining our inductively obtained results (e.g., Locke, 1968).”
Self-citation
Cited by
Van den Broeck, A., Howard, J. L., Van Vaerenbergh, Y., Leroy, H., & Gagné, M. (2021) · Organizational Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/20413866211006173 · Cited by 409
College Students’ Time Management: a Self-Regulated Learning Perspective
Wolters, C. A., & Brady, A. C. (2021) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-020-09519-z · Cited by 317
Changing Behavior Using the Model of Action Phases
Keller, L., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2020) · The Handbook of Behavior Change · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.006 · Cited by 147
The application of Goal Setting Theory to goal setting interventions in sport: a systematic review
Jeong, Y. H., Healy, L. C., & McEwan, D. (2023) · International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1080/1750984x.2021.1901298 · Cited by 113
Richards, K. L., Flynn, M., Austin, A., Lang, K., Allen, K. L., Bassi, R., Brady, G., Brown, A., Connan, F., Franklin-Smith, M., et al. (2021) · BJPsych Open · doi:10.1192/bjo.2021.51 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P.
- Venue
- Motivation Science
- Published
- 2019-06
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 93-105
- ISSN
- 2333-8113 (ISSN-L)
- 2333-8121
- OpenAlex
- W2910015122
- Cited by
- 657
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 51.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The development of goal setting theory: A half century retrospective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/mot0000127
- The paper
- Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2019). The development of goal setting theory: A half century retrospective. Motivation Science. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000127
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.