Cited by 4Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesEducation and Military Integration

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The association of parentification indicators with substance use patterns among military-connected adolescents.

Sullivan, Kathrine S., Capp, Gordon, Gilreath, Tamika D.·2023·American Journal of Orthopsychiatry

Abstract

Military-connected youths are a vulnerable population exposed to a unique set of stressors, which may put them at increased risk for adverse mental and behavioral health outcomes, compared to their civilian counterparts. Among military-connected adolescents, emotional and instrumental parentification are mechanisms hypothesized to account for negative outcomes, including substance use. However, parentification may be protective in some cultures and has not been examined in the military population. Data were drawn from 1,441 7th-, 9th-, and 11th-graders who had a parent in the military and completed the 2013 California Healthy Kids Survey. Latent class analysis was used to examine patterns of instrumental parentification indicators among military-connected youths and associated patterns of substance use. Military-connected students in the high parentification class were significantly less likely to be in the frequent polysubstance using class (odds ratio = 0.376, 95% confidence interval [0.180, 0.782]). Findings suggest that experiences of instrumental parentification, including having more responsibilities at home, being more independent, and being able to solve problems better than peers, may be protective. For military-connected youths, these skills, developed in the context of their families, may translate to better coping with other stressful situations. Professionals may be able to build on these strengths and develop adaptive coping strategies to support military-connected youths in managing the stressors of wartime military life. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/ort0000331

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 4

Metadata

Authors
Sullivan, K. S., Capp, G., & Gilreath, T. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Orthopsychiatry
Published
2023
Volume
93
Issue
6
Pages
557-565
ISSN
  • 0002-9432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0025
OpenAlex
W2884466988
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Orthopsychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Military Integration
Keywords
parentification, substance use, polydrug use, military families, adolescent stress, coping, California Healthy Kids Survey
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Health Surveys, Humans, Military Personnel, Parents, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review