CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 635Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingMental Health Treatment and Access

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cross-cultural validation of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale–21 in China.

Wang, Kui, Shi, Hai-Song, Geng, Fu-Lei, Zou, Lai-Quan, Tan, Shu-Ping, Wang, Yi, Neumann, David L., Shum, David H. K., Chan, Raymond C. K.·2016·Psychological Assessment
DOI 10.1037/pas0000207
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The gap between the demand and delivery of mental health services in mainland China can be reduced by validating freely available and psychometrically sound psychological instruments. The present research examined the Chinese version of the 21-item Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21). Study 1 administered the DASS-21 to 1,815 Chinese college students and found internal consistency indices (Cronbach's alpha) of .83, .80, and .82 for the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress subscales, respectively, and .92 for the total DASS total. Test-retest reliability over a 6-month interval was .39 to .46 for each of the 3 subscales and .46 for the total DASS. Moderate convergent validity of the Depression and Anxiety subscales was demonstrated via significant correlations with the Chinese Beck Depression Inventory (r = .51 at Time 1 and r = .64 at Time 2) and the Chinese State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (r = .41), respectively. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the original 3-factor model with 1 minor change (nonnormed fit index [NNFI] = .964, comparative fit index [CFI] = .968, and root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = .079). Study 2 examined the clinical utility of the Chinese DASS-21 in 166 patients with schizophrenia and 90 matched healthy controls. Patients had higher Depression and Anxiety but not Stress subscale scores than healthy controls. A discriminant function composed of the linear combination of 3 subscale scores correctly discriminated 69.92% of participants, which again supported the potential clinical utility of the DASS in mainland China. Taken together, findings in these studies support the cross-cultural validity of the DASS-21 in China. (PsycINFO Database Record

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/pas0000207

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 59 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 601–634 of 634

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Wang, K., Shi, H.-S., Geng, F.-L., Zou, L.-Q., Tan, S.-P., Wang, Y., Neumann, D. L., Shum, D. H. K., & Chan, R. C. K.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • North China Electric Power University (CN)
  • Griffith University (AU)
ORCID
Venue
Psychological Assessment
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2016-05
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
e88-e100
ISSN
  • 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-134X
DOI
10.1037/pas0000207
OpenAlex
W2275562271
Cited by
635
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 72 · 2025: 101 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 102 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 5
FWCI
20.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repository of Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Key Technologies (2012BAI36B01)
  • Sponsor name not included (Z151100000315020)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (KSCX2-EW-J-8, KLMH2014ZG09)
  • CAS
  • Griffith University (213507)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (31200775)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
DASS, DASS-21, Chinese version, cross-cultural validation, psychometric properties, depression, anxiety, stress, schizophrenia, university students, factor structure, discriminant function
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, China, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Depression, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Schizophrenia, Stress, Psychological, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review