Cited by 27Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Development of a self-distancing task and initial validation of responses

Open access
Shepherd, Kathrine A., Coifman, Karin G., Matt, Lindsey M., Fresco, David M.·2016·Psychological Assessment

Abstract

Mindfulness-based interventions are believed to counteract cognitive biases that exacerbate cognitive and physiological reactivity to emotional experiences and that contribute to the development and persistence of psychopathology. One process by which mindful practices may produce such salutary effects is by enhancing the capacity to "decenter"-or to adopt a self-distanced, nonjudgmental perspective on conscious experiences (e.g., thoughts, memories, and feelings). Findings consistently indicate that decentering, assessed via self-report, represents an important aspect of mental health and well-being; however, numerous researchers have called for more objective measures of skills associated with mindfulness and decentering to further evaluate the mechanisms and benefits of mindfulness-based practices. Thus, in the current investigation, we developed a behavioral task that requires mental manipulation of negative emotional (and neutral) material away from the self (self-distancing), as a means to assess the skills associated with mindfulness and decentering that likely underlie healthy emotional processing. In 2 nonmeditating, university samples, we found that higher levels of self-reported mindfulness and higher levels of 1 facet of decentering (the capacity to adopt a distanced perspective on experiences) predicted behavioral indicators of self-distancing. Results suggest that the self-distancing task shows considerable promise for capturing skills associated with mindfulness and at least 1 element of decentering. (PsycINFO Database Record

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/pas0000297

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Depressed individuals tend to score lower on self-report or objective behavioral measures of decentering.

    “Depressed individuals tend to score lower on self-report (Fresco et al., 2007a) or objective behavioral measures (Shepherd et al., 2016) of decentering.”

    From Distinct functional connectivities predict clinical response with emotion regulation therapy (2017) · cites this paper as Shepherd et al., 2016

    In Study 2’s Results (page not provided), higher depression symptoms were marginally associated with fewer correct responses on the self-distancing task (r = −.20, p = .063). The Discussion cautions that the sample was non-clinical, so this does not establish that clinically depressed individuals score lower on an objective measure of decentering. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 80 · Cited by 27

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Baer RA Walsh E Lykins EL Assessment of mindfulness Clinical handbook of mindfulness 2009 153 168 Springer

Authors
Shepherd, K. A., Coifman, K. G., Matt, L. M., & Fresco, D. M.
Affiliations
Kent State University (US)
Venue
Psychological Assessment
Published
2016-07
Volume
28
Issue
7
Pages
841-855
ISSN
  • 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-134X
OpenAlex
W2339624593
Cited by
27
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
5.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Mind and Life Institute
  • National Institutes of Health (1R01HL119977)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
self-distancing, decentering, mindfulness, emotional processing, negative emotions, cognitive biases, task validation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Psychological Tests, Thinking, Young Adult, Self Report, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review