Cited by 15Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingMental Health Research Topics

Factor mixture modeling of intolerance of uncertainty.

Oglesby, Mary E., Allan, Nicholas P., Short, Nicole A., Raines, Amanda M., Schmidt, Norman B.·2017·Psychological Assessment

Abstract

Intolerance of uncertainty (IU) is a multidimensional construct that has been proposed as an important transdiagnostic risk factor across various anxiety and mood disorders. Recent work found support for IU having a continuous latent structure when utilizing taxometric methods. However, taxometrics may not be ideally suited to examine the latent structure of constructs such as IU given the methodological shortcomings associated with this technique. The current study applied factor mixture modeling, a statistical technique that overcomes shortcomings of prior work, to examine the latent structure of IU in a sample of 371 individuals presenting at an outpatient clinic. Findings indicated that the best fitting solution was a 3-class model with 1 class consisting of individuals with high levels of IU (High IU; n = 55) and 1 containing individuals with low levels of IU (Low IU; n = 206). Our third class, labeled Moderate IU, consisted of 110 individuals with levels of IU between those of the High IU and Low IU groups. There were also significant differences across the 3 IU classes, including the relations between IU classes and anxiety-related and depressive disorders. The current investigation was the first to find evidence of IU having a categorical latent structure. Implications for research and clinical utility are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/pas0000357

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 65 · Cited by 15

Authors
Oglesby, M. E., Allan, N. P., Short, N. A., Raines, A. M., & Schmidt, N. B.
Affiliations
Florida State University (US)
Venue
Psychological Assessment
Published
2017-04
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
435-445
ISSN
  • 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-134X
OpenAlex
W2472716139
Cited by
15
References
65
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
intolerance of uncertainty, factor mixture modeling, latent structure, anxiety disorders, depressive disorders, transdiagnostic risk factors, outpatient clinic patients
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Statistical, Uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review