Cited by 93Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPersonality Traits and PsychologyMental Health Research Topics

A comprehensive comparison of the ICD-11 and DSM–5 section III personality disorder models.

McCabe, Gillian A., Widiger, Thomas A.·2020·Psychological Assessment

Abstract

The ICD-11 model of personality disorder consists of a level of severity, 5 trait domains, and a borderline pattern qualifier. Level of severity is assessed by the Standardized Assessment of Severity of Personality Disorder (SASPD; Olajide et al., 2018), the trait model by the Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (PiCD; Oltmanns & Widiger, 2018), and the borderline pattern qualifier by the Borderline Pattern Specifier inventory (BPS; Oltmanns & Widiger, 2019). The DSM-5 Section III Alternative Model of Personality Disorder includes a level of personality functioning and the five-domain trait model. These two components are assessed by the Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS; Morey, 2017) and the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5; Krueger, Derringer, Markon, Watson, & Skodol, 2012). Components of each model have been related to one another, but no study has yet considered all of the components for both models within one study. The current study considers the convergent, discriminant, and structural validity of the relationship of the LPFS and PID-5 with the SASPD, PiCD, and BPS. Also included were multiple measures of borderline personality disorder to determine if the BPS obtains incremental validity in accounting for borderline personality disorder variance above and beyond the trait models. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/pas0000772

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 61 · Cited by 93

Authors
McCabe, G. A., & Widiger, T. A.
Affiliations
University of Kentucky (US)
Venue
Psychological Assessment
Published
2020-01
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
72-84
ISSN
  • 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-134X
OpenAlex
W2978088992
Cited by
93
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 2
FWCI
14.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
personality disorders, ICD-11, DSM-5 Section III, PID-5, borderline personality disorder, convergent validity, discriminant validity, incremental validity
MeSH terms
Adult, Borderline Personality Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Personality, Personality Disorders, Personality Inventory, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results, International Classification of Diseases, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review