“My smartphone is an extension of myself”: A holistic qualitative exploration of the impact of using a smartphone
Abstract
Six billion people worldwide will be using smartphones in 2020 (Jonsson et al., 2017). The devices pose convenient solutions for leisure and work-related activities (Kuss, 2017). However, psychometric and addiction-based guidelines increasingly align smartphone over-use with technological addictions (Billieux et al., 2014). A more holistic exploration of smartphone use might help to highlight how everyday use interacts with or underpins more addictive forms of behaviours. Thus, this study aimed to explore in-depth experiences of smartphone use to understand from a holistic perspective what the perceptions and experiences of the devices are to smartphone users, using a qualitative focus group study (n=21, 11 females). Data were analysed using constructivist grounded theory. Results indicated smartphones were entwined with users’ lives as they formed an ‘extension of the self’. Subcategories highlighted that the devices hold value by ‘externalising identity’, ‘constant connectivity’, ‘mediating intimacy’, ‘authenticating experiences’, and ‘forfeiting agency’. In conclusion, the usability of the smartphone may create an interactive relationship with the sense of self. Close relationships with smartphones appear to shape interpersonal relationships. Additionally, participants held an expectation that the user has agency over their actions, which is at odds with evidence of un-autonomous, compulsive behaviours. Regarding the study’s public significance, this false perception of control may pose challenges for interventions which aim to reduce problematic smartphone use. Further research should contrast user perceptions using real-time smartphone data to understand the degree of true insight users have over their own behaviours.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Because of all the positive uses for smartphones, users may concentrate on beneficial uses while ignoring the potential harms.
“Because of all the positive uses for smartphones, users may concentrate on beneficial uses while ignoring the potential harms.19”
From An Intervention Utilizing the Salience Principle to Reduce Pharmacy Students’ Psychological Attraction to Smartphones (2022) · cites this paper as [19]
The Introduction says that people who perceive smartphones as beneficial may continue using them despite potential harms to cognition and wellbeing. That supports the idea that benefits can outweigh concerns, but it does not establish that users concentrate on beneficial uses while ignoring harms. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredDespite self-professed desire to decrease use, individuals may struggle to break or reduce the attachment.
“Despite self-professed desire to decrease use, individuals may struggle to break or reduce the attachment.19”
From An Intervention Utilizing the Salience Principle to Reduce Pharmacy Students’ Psychological Attraction to Smartphones (2022) · cites this paper as [19]
Smartphone distractions can hamper enjoyment, personal connections, and satisfaction with others.
“This theme adds credence to previous research showing that smartphone distractions can hamper enjoyment, personal connections, and satisfaction with others.19”
From An Intervention Utilizing the Salience Principle to Reduce Pharmacy Students’ Psychological Attraction to Smartphones (2022) · cites this paper as [19]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 59 · Cited by 43
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Chamberlain-Salaun, J., Mills, J., & Usher, K. (2013). Linking symbolic interactionism and grounded theory methods in a research design: From Corbin and Strauss' assumptions to action. SAGE open, 3(3), 1-10.
- Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory . London: SAGE Publications Ltd
- Krasnova, H., Abramova, O., Notter, I., Baumann, A., & Krasnova, R. (2016). Why Phubbing is Toxic for your relationship: Understanding the Role of Smartphone Jealousy among generation Y Users. ECIS 2016 Proceedings , 109.
- StatCounter. (2016). Press Release: Mobile and tablet internet usage exceeds desktop for first time worldwide | StatCounter Global Stats. Retrieved from http://gs.statcounter.com/press/mobileand-tablet-internet-usage-exceeds-desktop-for-first-time-worldwide
- Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2009). Social consequences of the Internet for adolescents: A decade of research. Current directions in psychological science , 18(1), 1-5.
- Authors
- Harkin, L. J., & Kuss, D.
- Affiliations
- Nottingham Trent University (GB)
- Venue
- Psychology of Popular Media
- Published
- 2021-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 28-38
- ISSN
- 2689-6567 (ISSN-L)
- 2689-6575
- OpenAlex
- W3007094215
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 8.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychology of Popular Media (publishedVersion)
- Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Digital Media and Philosophy
- Keywords
- smartphone use, smartphone overuse, technology addiction, constant connectivity, intimacy, agency, perceived control, smartphone addiction, interpersonal relationships, compulsive behaviour
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review