Cited by 104LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

An AFFIRMative cognitive behavioral intervention for transgender youth: Preliminary effectiveness

Austin, Ashley, Craig, Shelley L., D'Souza, Sandra A.·2018·Professional Psychology Research and Practice

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/pro0000154

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 104

Authors
Austin, A., Craig, S. L., & D'Souza, S. A.
Affiliations
Barry University (US)
Venue
Professional Psychology Research and Practice
Published
2018-02
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
1-8
ISSN
  • 0735-7028 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1323
OpenAlex
W2772024492
Cited by
104
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4
FWCI
11.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Professional Psychology Research and Practice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
transgender youth, cognitive behavioral therapy, gender-affirming care, sexual minority youth, intervention effectiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review