Cited by 157Social and Intergroup PsychologyDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionPersonality Traits and Psychology

Low self-esteem predicts out-group derogation via collective narcissism, but this relationship is obscured by in-group satisfaction.

Open access
Golec de Zavala, Agnieszka, Federico, Christopher M., Sedikides, Constantine, Guerra, Rita, Lantos, Dorottya, Mroziński, Błażej, Cypryańska, Marzena, Baran, Tomasz·2020·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

According to social identity theory, low self-esteem motivates group members to derogate out-groups, thus achieving positive in-group distinctiveness and boosting self-esteem. According to the Frankfurt School and status politics theorists, low self-esteem motivates collective narcissism (i.e., resentment for insufficient external recognition of the in-group's importance), which predicts out-group derogation. Empirical support for these propositions has been weak. We revisit them addressing whether (a) low self-esteem predicts out-group derogation via collective narcissism and (b) this indirect relationship is only observed after partialing out the positive overlap between collective narcissism and in-group satisfaction (i.e., belief that the in-group is of high value and a reason to be proud). Results based on cross-sectional (Study 1, N = 427) and longitudinal (Study 2, N = 853) designs indicated that self-esteem is uniquely, negatively linked to collective narcissism and uniquely, positively linked to in-group satisfaction. Results based on cross-sectional (Study 3, N = 506; Study 4, N = 1,059; Study 5, N = 471), longitudinal (Study 6, N = 410), and experimental (Study 7, N = 253) designs corroborated these inferences. Further, they revealed that the positive overlap between collective narcissism and in-group satisfaction obscures the link between self-esteem and out-group derogation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/pspp0000260

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Polish collective narcissism is related to anti-Semitism.

    “For example, Polish collective narcissism is related to anti-Semitism (Golec de Zavala et al., 2019a;Golec de Zavala & Sedikides, 2019),”

    From Collective Narcissism: Political Consequences of Investing Self‐Worth in the Ingroup’s Image (2019) · cites this paper as Golec de Zavala & Sedikides, 2019

  • Collective narcissism is related to binding moral foundations important for political conservatives.

    “Studies indicate that collective narcissism is related to binding moral foundations important for political conservatives (Golec de Zavala & Federico, 2019).”

    From Collective Narcissism: Political Consequences of Investing Self‐Worth in the Ingroup’s Image (2019) · cites this paper as Golec de Zavala & Federico, 2019

  • After participating in the mindful gratitude meditation, Polish collective narcissists were twice less likely to hold negative attitudes towards Jews in comparison to the control condition or mindfulness without gratitude content.

    “After participating in the mindful gratitude meditation, Polish collective narcissists were twice less likely to hold negative attitudes towards Jews in comparison to the control condition or mindfulness without gratitude content (Golec de Zavala & Sedikides, 2019).”

    From Collective Narcissism: Political Consequences of Investing Self‐Worth in the Ingroup’s Image (2019) · cites this paper as Golec de Zavala & Sedikides, 2019

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 119 · Cited by 157

Authors
Golec de Zavala, A., Federico, C. M., Sedikides, C., Guerra, R., Lantos, D., Mroziński, B., Cypryańska, M., & Baran, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • Iscte – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (PT)
  • Goldsmiths University of London (GB)
  • Uniwersytet SWPS (PL)
  • University of Warsaw (PL)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2020-09
Volume
119
Issue
3
Pages
741-764
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2954444932
Cited by
157
References
119
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 3
FWCI
37.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Goldsmiths (University of London) (acceptedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • Repositório do ISCTE-IUL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Science Centre (2017/26/A/HS6/00647)
  • SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities—Warsaw (WP/2017/A/24)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
self-esteem, collective narcissism, outgroup derogation, social identity theory, status politics, Frankfurt School
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Group Processes, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Narcissism, Personal Satisfaction, Self Concept

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review