The meaning of social support for persons with serious mental illness.
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: This study sought to better understand the population-specific types of social support relevant to adults living with serious mental illness (SMI). Our study was exploratory and used a qualitative approach that centered on uncovering the types of social support meaningful and relevant to persons with SMI. METHOD: The sample comprised of 52 adults receiving county mental health services in the San Francisco Bay Area. Data was gathered from 6 focus groups and analyzed using NVivo10 and Consensual Qualitative Research (CQR; Hill et al., 2005; Hill et al., 1997). RESULTS: Six qualitative domains were identified: (a) supportive conditions, (b) day-to-day living, (c) illness management, (d) resources and information, (e) guidance and advice, and (f) community participation support. DISCUSSION: While the 6 support domains share some broad-based conceptual underpinnings with traditional models of emotional and instrumental support, the domains emerging from our study represent supports uniquely tied to the stressors associated with living with SMI, and therefore hold conceptual distinction from traditional types of support. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Findings from this study offer a conceptual framework for understanding social support for persons living with SMI and lay the groundwork for the development of a SMI-specific measure of social support. In addition, our research permits future researchers to investigate the conditions under which social support buffers the impact of SMI stressors, assisting service providers in more effective identification of individual support needs for clinical intervention.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Individuals with serious mental illnesses who may be uncomfortable with or avoidant of conventional social contact may perceive digital interactions as less threatening.
“In addition, as discussed previously, individuals with serious mental illnesses who may be uncomfortable with or avoidant of conventional social contact may perceive digital interactions as less threatening [144].”
From The therapeutic alliance in digital mental health interventions for serious mental illnesses: narrative review (2020) · cites this paper as [144]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 57
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- Bambina AD Online social support: The interplay of social networks and computer-mediated communication 2007 Cambria Press
- Cohen S Ryff CD Singer’s BH Social relationships and susceptibility to the common cold Emotion, Social Relationships, and Health 2001 Oxford University Press New York
- Cutrona CE Russell DW Sarason BR Sarason IG Pierce’s GR Type of social support and specific stress: Toward a theory of optimal matching Social support: An interactional view 1990 319 366 Wiley New York
- Davidson L Stayner D Loss, loneliness, and the desire for love: Perspectives on the social lives of people with schizophrenia Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 1997 3 11 volume
- Dunkel-Schetter C Social support and cancer: Findings based on patient interviews and their implications Journal of Social Issues 1984 40 77 98
- Eichhorn KC Soliciting and providing social support over the Internet: An investigation of online eating disorder support groups Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2008 14 67 78
- Gulcur L Stefancic A Shin M Housing hospitalization and cost outcomes for homeless individuals with psychiatric disabilities participating in continuum of care and housing first programmes Journal of Community Applied Social Psychology 2003 13 171 186
- Knapp ML Stohl C Reardon KK “Memorable” messages Journal of Communication 1981 31 2741
- Kordesh KS Spanierman LB Neville HA White university students’ racial affect: Understanding the antiracist type Journal of Diversity in Higher Education 2013 6 33 50
- Lehman DR Ellard JH Wortman CB Social support for the bereaved: Recipients’ and providers’ perspectives on what is helpful Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1986 54 438 446
- Marchionini G Teague J Elementary students’ use of electronic information services: An exploratory study Journal of Research on Computing in Education 1987 20 139 155
- Morrow SL Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology Journal of Counseling Psychology 2005 52 250 260 doi:
- Nelson G Hall BG Bowers WR Prediction of the adaptation of people with psychiatric disabilities in group homes, supportive apartments, and board-and-care-homes Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 1999 22 381 389
- Notarius C Herrick L Listener response strategies to a distressed other Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 1988 5 97 108
- Pfeil U Zaphiris P Patterns of empathy in online communication 2007 Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
- Philipsen G Speaking culturally: Explorations in social communication 1992 State University of New York Press Albany
- Pitts JM Personal understandings and mental models of information: a qualitative study of factors associated with the information-seeking and use of adolescents PhD Thesis 1994 Florida State University
- Reisman JM Shorr S Developmental changes in friendship related communication skills Journal of Clinical Child Psychology 1980 36 676 679
- Sharir D Tanasescu M Turbow D Mamam Y Social support and quality of life among psychiatric patients in residential homes The International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation 2007 11 85 98
- Tripathi RC Caplan RD Naidu RK Accepting advice: A modifier of social support’s effect on well-being Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 1986 3 213 228
- Whitley R Harris M Fallot RD Berley RW The active ingredients of intentional recovery communities: Focus group evaluation Journal of Mental Health 2008 17 173 182
- Authors
- Chronister, J., Chou, C.-C., Kwan, K.-L. K., Lawton, M., & Silver, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Arizona (US)
- ORCID
- Chronister, Julie
- Venue
- Rehabilitation Psychology
- Published
- 2015-08
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 232-245
- ISSN
- 0090-5550 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1544
- PMC
- PMC4564308
- OpenAlex
- W1806210563
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 7.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Rehabilitation Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R15MH095011)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Keywords
- social support, severe mental illness, community mental health services, illness management, community participation, support needs assessment
- MeSH terms
- Mental Disorders, Community Participation, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, San Francisco, Severity of Illness Index, Social Support, Focus Groups
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review