The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
Rehabilitants’ conscientiousness as a moderator of the intention–planning-behavior chain.
Abstract
Purpose/objective After rehabilitation, it is important to maintain adopted target behaviors such as physical activity and physical exercise. By generating detailed behavioral plans, rehabilitants may translate their intentions into actual behavior. The aim of this study was to investigate whether Conscientiousness would further facilitate this mechanism in a way that rehabilitants who are more conscientious would be more likely to act upon their plans. Research Method/Design: The study presents secondary analyses from a larger intervention in cardiac and orthopedic rehabilitation. N = 136 rehabilitants were surveyed via online questionnaires during treatment (Time 1 [T1]) and with computer-assisted telephone interviews (CATIs) 6 weeks (Time 2 [T2]) and 6 months (Time 3 [T3]) after discharge from the clinic. Intention, planning, Conscientiousness, and behavior were measured. A conditional process analysis examined whether Conscientiousness moderates the intention-planning-physical activity chain. Results Planning had a mediating effect on intentions and physical activity. Moreover, this mediation effect was conditional on the level of Conscientiousness: Highly conscientious rehabilitants were more successful in translating their plans into behavior than their less conscientious counterparts. Conclusions/implications Self-regulatory mechanisms such as action-facilitating planning strategies may be more efficient in conscientious rehabilitants. Conscientiousness reflects dispos…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Conscientiousness shows a positive correlation with rehabilitation adherence.
“Conscientiousness shows a positive correlation with rehabilitation adherence (Hilliard et al., 2014;Lippke et al., 2018).”
From Beyond yellow flags: The Big‐Five personality traits and psychologically informed musculoskeletal rehabilitation. (2023) · cites this paper as Lippke et al., 2018
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Lippke, S., Pomp, S., & Fleig, L.
- Affiliations
- Constructor University (DE)
- AOK (DE)
- Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
- Venue
- Rehabilitation Psychology
- Published
- 2018-08
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 460-467
- ISSN
- 0090-5550 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1544
- OpenAlex
- W2885694131
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 1.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Rehabilitation Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
- Keywords
- conscientiousness, intention-behavior relationship, behavior planning, physical activity maintenance, self-regulation, cardiac rehabilitation, orthopedic rehabilitation, moderating effect, conditional process analysis
- MeSH terms
- Cardiac Rehabilitation, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Personality, Health Behavior, Exercise, Intention, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review