Cited by 11Behavioral Health and InterventionsPhysical Activity and HealthCardiac Health and Mental Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

Rehabilitants’ conscientiousness as a moderator of the intention–planning-behavior chain.

Lippke, Sonia, Pomp, Sarah, Fleig, Lena·2018·Rehabilitation Psychology

Abstract

Purpose/objective After rehabilitation, it is important to maintain adopted target behaviors such as physical activity and physical exercise. By generating detailed behavioral plans, rehabilitants may translate their intentions into actual behavior. The aim of this study was to investigate whether Conscientiousness would further facilitate this mechanism in a way that rehabilitants who are more conscientious would be more likely to act upon their plans. Research Method/Design: The study presents secondary analyses from a larger intervention in cardiac and orthopedic rehabilitation. N = 136 rehabilitants were surveyed via online questionnaires during treatment (Time 1 [T1]) and with computer-assisted telephone interviews (CATIs) 6 weeks (Time 2 [T2]) and 6 months (Time 3 [T3]) after discharge from the clinic. Intention, planning, Conscientiousness, and behavior were measured. A conditional process analysis examined whether Conscientiousness moderates the intention-planning-physical activity chain. Results Planning had a mediating effect on intentions and physical activity. Moreover, this mediation effect was conditional on the level of Conscientiousness: Highly conscientious rehabilitants were more successful in translating their plans into behavior than their less conscientious counterparts. Conclusions/implications Self-regulatory mechanisms such as action-facilitating planning strategies may be more efficient in conscientious rehabilitants. Conscientiousness reflects dispos…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/rep0000210

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 11

Metadata

Authors
Lippke, S., Pomp, S., & Fleig, L.
Affiliations
  • Constructor University (DE)
  • AOK (DE)
  • Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Venue
Rehabilitation Psychology
Published
2018-08
Volume
63
Issue
3
Pages
460-467
ISSN
  • 0090-5550 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1544
OpenAlex
W2885694131
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Rehabilitation Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
conscientiousness, intention-behavior relationship, behavior planning, physical activity maintenance, self-regulation, cardiac rehabilitation, orthopedic rehabilitation, moderating effect, conditional process analysis
MeSH terms
Cardiac Rehabilitation, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Personality, Health Behavior, Exercise, Intention, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review