The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Examining the construct validity of posttraumatic growth following moderate–severe traumatic brain injury: A mixed-methods analysis.
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: Posttraumatic growth (PTG) refers to positive changes that individuals experience in the wake of a stressful or traumatic event. Though growth and adaptation are considered ideal outcomes of rehabilitation, the extent to which PTG captures the unique experience of individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) has not been empirically evaluated. The purpose of the current study was to establish construct validity of PTG for individuals following moderate-severe TBI. RESEARCH METHOD: Forty participants who received inpatient or outpatient rehabilitation services for moderate-severe TBI and who were > 1 year postinjury completed a one-time phone interview of mental health and quality of life assessments, and answered a free-response question about significant life changes after injury. Using convergent parallel design, scores on the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI) were compared to other assessments and themes of PTG and posttraumatic depreciation derived through thematic analysis. RESULTS: = 11.20 years). Qualitatively derived themes of PTG aligned with domains of the PTGI, and endorsement of PTG was significantly associated with greater mental health and social support. DISCUSSION: This study provides evidence of the existence of PTG and posttraumatic depreciation in a sample of individuals with moderate-severe TBI, supporting its construct validity using mixed-methods data. Our findings may be helpful in identifying what significant changes may indicate significant growth and depreciation during the rehabilitation process, and be critical mechanisms for optimal psychosocial adjustment following brain injury. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PTD, such as perceiving oneself as weaker or less capable following a seismic event, often exists concurrently with reports of increased personal strength or the pursuit of new possibilities.
“Their results specifically highlight that PTD, such as perceiving oneself as weaker or less capable following a seismic event, often exists concurrently with reports of increased personal strength or the pursuit of new possibilities.”
From The coexistence and trajectories of posttraumatic growth and depreciation: a 36-month longitudinal qualitative narrative analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [47]
In Agtarap et al.'s thematic analysis, growth themes were identified more than three times as frequently as those related to depreciation.
“This pattern is further corroborated by the aforementioned thematic analysis of Agtarap et al. [47], in which growth themes were identified more than three times as frequently as those related to depreciation.”
From The coexistence and trajectories of posttraumatic growth and depreciation: a 36-month longitudinal qualitative narrative analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [47]
Themes of growth and depreciation are not mutually exclusive and frequently co-occur within the same individual.
“Our results are strongly supported by recent mixed-methods evidence from Agtarap et al. [47], who utilised thematic analysis of free-response narratives to demonstrate that themes of growth and depreciation are not mutually exclusive and frequently co-occur within the same individual.”
From The coexistence and trajectories of posttraumatic growth and depreciation: a 36-month longitudinal qualitative narrative analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [47]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Agtarap, S., Peckham, M., Lundstern, M., Bistricky, S., Boals, A., Gallagher, J., Hanks, R., Klyce, D. W., & Perrin, P. B.
- Affiliations
- Craig Hospital (US)
- University of North Texas (US)
- University of Denver (US)
- Wayne State University (US)
- Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
- United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Rehabilitation Psychology
- Published
- 2025-11
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 457-471
- ISSN
- 0090-5550 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1544
- OpenAlex
- W4407299401
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 2.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Rehabilitation Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Keywords
- posttraumatic growth, traumatic brain injury, moderate to severe TBI, construct validity, Posttraumatic Growth Inventory, psychosocial adjustment, mental health, social support, quality of life, rehabilitation outcomes
- MeSH terms
- Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Posttraumatic Growth, Psychological, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review