Cited by 157Cultural Differences and ValuesEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorLanguage and cultural evolution

The behavioral ecology of cultural psychological variation.

Sng, Oliver, Neuberg, Steven L., Varnum, Michael E. W., Kenrick, Douglas T.·2018·Psychological Review

Abstract

Recent work has documented a wide range of important psychological differences across societies. Multiple explanations have been offered for why such differences exist, including historical philosophies, subsistence methods, social mobility, social class, climactic stresses, and religion. With the growing body of theory and data, there is an emerging need for an organizing framework. We propose here that a behavioral ecological perspective, particularly the idea of adaptive phenotypic plasticity, can provide an overarching framework for thinking about psychological variation across cultures and societies. We focus on how societies vary as a function of six important ecological dimensions: density, relatedness, sex ratio, mortality likelihood, resources, and disease. This framework can: (a) highlight new areas of research, (b) integrate and ground existing cultural psychological explanations, (c) integrate research on variation across human societies with research on parallel variations in other animal species, (d) provide a way for thinking about multiple levels of culture and cultural change, and (e) facilitate the creation of an ecological taxonomy of societies, from which one can derive specific predictions about cultural differences and similarities. Finally, we discuss the relationships between the current framework and existing perspectives. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/rev0000104

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Disease rates are linked to fast life strategies.

    “Research on life-history strategies has linked disease rates to fast life strategies (Sng etal., 2018).”

    From Cultures in Water-Scarce Environments Are More Long-Term Oriented (2023) · cites this paper as Sng et al., 2018

  • Humans adapt their behavior to the constraints and resources in their environment.

    “The findings are also consistent with the theory that humans adapt their behavior to the constraints and resources in their environment (Sng etal., 2018).”

    From Cultures in Water-Scarce Environments Are More Long-Term Oriented (2023) · cites this paper as Sng et al., 2018

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 293 · Cited by 157

Authors
Sng, O., Neuberg, S. L., Varnum, M. E. W., & Kenrick, D. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
Venue
Psychological Review
Published
2018-10
Volume
125
Issue
5
Pages
714-743
ISSN
  • 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1471
OpenAlex
W2801941484
Cited by
157
References
293
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 4
FWCI
16.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
Keywords
behavioral ecology, adaptive plasticity, cross-cultural comparison, population density, relatedness, sex ratio, mortality risk, resource availability, disease, cultural change
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Behavioral Sciences, Culture, Ecology, Humans, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review