The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A process model of mindsets: Conceptualizing mindsets of ability as dynamic and socially situated.
Abstract
Mindsets of ability (i.e., "fixed" and "growth" mindsets) play a pivotal role in students' academic trajectories. However, relatively little is known about the mechanisms underlying mindset development. Identifying these mechanisms is vital for understanding, and potentially influencing, how mindsets emerge and change over time. In this article, we formulate a comprehensive theoretical model that purports to account for the emergence and development of ability mindsets: the process model of mindsets (PMM). The PMM is rooted in complex dynamic systems and enactive perspectives, which allow for conceptualizing psychological phenomena as dynamic and socially situated. The PMM accounts for how mindset-related behaviors, action tendencies, beliefs, and social interactions can become codependent and robust over time. We discuss how the model helps to further our understanding of the efficacy of mindset interventions and the heterogeneity thereof. The PMM has a broad explanatory scope, is generative, and paves the way for future process studies of mindsets and mindset interventions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, the study of processes of identity development requires not only a focus on the unfolding of actions within and across conversation but also a theoretical focus on the development of individuals (De Ruiter & Thomaes, 2023).”
From Studying Identity Development in Everyday Conversations: A Practical Guide to Developmental Discursive Micro-Analysis (DDMA) (2026) · cites this paper as De Ruiter & Thomaes, 2023
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Metadata
- Authors
- de Ruiter, N. M. P., & Thomaes, S.
- Venue
- Psychological Review
- Published
- 2023-10
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1326-1338
- ISSN
- 1939-1471
- 0033-295X
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
- National Initiative for Education Research (405.16380.015)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review